Originally Posted By: the G-man of Zur-En-Arrh
 Originally Posted By: thedoctor
 Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
No. As previously discussed not everyone is treated equally under bankruptcy. (remember how you were for the miniority creditors who wanted to get paid first?) Even with the pension bailout the government doesn't distribute funds equally. Those that were with a company longer get more.


You're talking out of your ass again. Those minor creditors where people who gave GM and Chrysler money to keep the companies going so that they could keep those UAW workers employed. They were secured debt holders who were supposed to get priority over the unsecured holders (i.e. the unions) but weren't because they aren't considered necessary votes to the DNC and Obama.


 Originally Posted By: the G-man of Zur-En-Arrh
He made this argument before and was discredited back during the Chrysler bankruptcy. The only "promises" MEM finds binding are the ones to big contributors to the DNC.


MEM thinks that, if he stretches a thread out long enough no one will remember/read the parts where he gets his rhetorical ass handed to him. So he makes some specious claim, it gets disproven, and then he waits until a few pages later in the thread (or days or weeks) to make it again as if it had never been discussed before.