But the more I think on it, the more I realize that the terminology really needed to be vague. Sexuality is a spectrum. We have everything from transgendered issues, to asexuality, to corn fed heterosexuality...the most fringe among them being the most in need of protection
Vague laws are exactly the kind that end up being misinterpreted.
I'll agree. But the likelihood of this one following the course you've outlined is virtually non-existent. You've overstepped your own insane zeal to vilify the administration by spouting bullshit, yet again.
As I said though, there is no way to pin this down and say exactly who is protected...as this is not yet defined as a society. It needs some wiggle room. The legal system can define both who is included, and who is excluded, via normal legal proceedings.
I don't think there's a doctor out there (although, again, being a nation of opportunist leeches...anything's possible) who would stand up and declare pedophilia as a viable 'sexual orientation'. It's clearly in the category of 'criminally insane'....much the same as a serial killer and a rapist.
