Again, a weak, convoluted and completely bogus argument on your part.
What I actually said:
Originally Posted By: WB
blah blah blah yackity schmackity
Yes! You said all that! No need to quote it. We've all seen that post ten times by now. We know you said it. But you also said:
Originally Posted By: Wondy poo
All that said, if I were to recommend to someone some of the best written and illustrated comic series of the last 40 years, I would name at the top of the list Moore's SWAMP THING, MIRACLEMAN, V FOR VENDETTA, WATCHMEN, and SUPERMAN: WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE MAN OF TOMORROW.
You want me to keep looking, Wondee? Because I weill, and I guarantee you won't be able to rationalize what I'll find.
I think it's time to re-state my point, because I can smell a misdirection coming and I'll have to explain it all over again anyway. 'sokay, I've dealt with senile people before.
So here it is: You've conceded that some comics with fucked up shit in them are great, despite the fact that there's fucked up shit in them. However, you refuse to see past the fucked up shit in modern comics and judge them solely based on that. You claim the fucked up shit in Watchmen and others (back when you were still defending them, I mean) is balanced out in the end by moments of genuine emotion and such. However, geniune emotion also exists in comics like Preacher, believe it or not. The only reason you can't get that through your head is because you are old and very, very stupid. I mean, EXTREMELY stupid, Dave. I am amazed you have managed to stay alive for such a long time (and I do mean a LONG time) being as moronic and oblivious as you are.
