You keep trying to imply otherwise, in tea-leaf reading abstractions, against things I clearly stated and repeatedly quoted.
Again: you say "things I clearly stated" but don't specify what. That Moore and Miller's 80's work is flawed? I already addressed that. Yes, you said it was flawed, but you also said it was good despite those flaws and, in fact, better written than anything else in the past 40 years.
Yoy also say that my lies are "proven"... but you don't prove anything. You limit yourself to declaring them exposed and leave it that, never bothering to post any actual refutations.
I'm sorry that it makes you further look like an idiot, that you can't understand what I already posted 10 times.
It's not my fault that you're a troll and an idiot.
