What part of "Moore and Miller's stories are good but overly dark works" do you not understand? We're back to your problem understanding plain english.
I've said I understand that a million times, Donna. I've never disputed the fact that you think these works are somehow hurt by their darkness. It's the "GOOD" part what's relevant to my argument. And that takes us to...
Quote:
First you strawmanned me to be hypocritical in condemning cynicism of the modern books, that you alleged to be in contradiction of my praising the Moore and Miller material.
No, Wondy. You only saw it that way because you think everyone's out to get you.
I wasn't calling you an hypocrit. When this whole thing started, I wasn't making an argument about YOU... I was making an argument about comics. You said "these works are good BUT...", and I took the "good" part and used it to prove that, if these works are dark and good, so can others. That's my whole argument here.
The argument only became about you once you started showcasing your stupidity (as you're bound to) and it became irresistible for me to point it out. The fact that you took my arguments as a personal attack (when in fact my personal attacks are all clearly distinguishable from my arguments) only goes too prove how broken your mind is. You are barely a thinking person, Cassie.
I think an hypocrit is someone who consciously contradicts their own opinions. You're too oblivious to see the flaws in your "reasoning". There's no ill-will in your intolerance, only the purest, most sincere form of idiocy.
