I've said that poorly written court decisions often have unintended consequences and have speculated on what sort of consequences can occur and have occurred. Sometimes seriously, sometimes in a more tongue in cheek fashion.
But those are consequences of the courts' faulty reasoning, not gay marriage.
My point all along hasn't been 'anti gay marriage.' It's been the same as yours, to wit, "the will of the people" and "marriage is not a right."
You really need to stop arguing just to argue. It's making you look schizophrenic.
You decide to attack MEM or Ray so you argue what are basically conservative talking points.
Then you decide to argue with me so you claim the points I've made--points which confirm and illustrate what you wrote--are extemist and nutty.
