Talking Points 101. Keep the politics in the Poli forum, G.
You're the one who made it a point to describe him with rhetoric equally, if not more, political.
In your opinion, but neither in intent or fact. You see what you want.
I don't remember him being some great humanitarian whose purpose was to "improve humanity".
Making useful products and services doesn't improve humanity?
Only as a side-effect of keeping his bottomline looking profitable. Once again, he didn't give the needed advancement for free, so that we could have affordable holo-imaging-systems to find cancer, or to scientific circles to help find the Higgs-boson Particle. He used his "great genius" to sell new cell phones and make people think they need to have something to watch on them at all times. Fun tech? Yes. Worthy of deification? Nope.
