Originally Posted By: Ultimate Jaburg53
 Originally Posted By: Prometheus
 Originally Posted By: Ultimate Jaburg53
 Originally Posted By: Prometheus
 Originally Posted By: Ultimate Jaburg53
No. It's not.


About protesting? Disagree.
It's not a verb, I was mistaken.

I just don't agree that the protesters need to sleep in the park.


Fair enough. If I genuinely thought the Movement wouldn't be ignored by moving it in-doors to an "official" venue, I'd be all for that. I'm sure there's a LOT of those fuckers that want to get out of the cold, as well. But, funny enough, their principles get in the way...


I'm just saying don't sleep at the protest. Keep it at the park.

I don't care about that.


The thing is, the park isn't where they're protesting. It's just where they're sleeping. Also, it's private land and not owned by the city. So they're trespassing, but early on city officials threatened the owners of the park if they tried to remove the protestors. Now, the city realizes how big of a cluster fuck it is to have a shitload of squatters living in a park for over a month. Those guys have a right to protest, and I think they should stand outside those giant banks with their signs and slogans. But they don't have the right to trespass and mooch off of other people.

whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."