A short skirt and no undies shows she was not concerned about the privacy of her privates.
Here's the thing: I'm inclined to agree. But I'm not prepared to call myself a mind reader, so I refrain from arriving to the conclusion. At most, I can just call her a disingenuous retard.
I'd be willing to bet that Jolie or Madonna refrained from wearing underwear at multiple functions. However, regardless of that, we didn't see any coochie. Does that mean they were still asking for it and we just decided not to oblige their request?
Look. Guys. I get it. We like seeing attractive wimmins' lady parts flashed in public (or in Hathaway's case, not unattractive), but do we really need to go out of our way to rationalize these events with kneejerk 'they brought it on themselves' mentalities?
