What? From what I saw, he said the discussions were principally the same according to the left's original tune about how our genes establish who we are. And that's what made peoples' mad dash to discredit the idea pretty funny: 'cuz it was so hypocritical. After all, if genes can govern sexual preference, it stands to reason that they can govern intelligence too. If it were to be established that any behavior is predisposed in us by are genes, it could easily be used as a corollary for Shockler's hypothesis.
I don't think many people, let alone Wondy, would take the study seriously. But his point seems to be that the left would have no choice but to consider it since the great bulk of social liberals have already acknowledged some genial ingraining of behavioral traits such as same sex preference. Their abject denial of the study undoes the credibility of their argument.
