At this point, it's looking more like the conversation they had was real. Aside from his confirmed attendance at XOXO, and his SJW-advocate girlfriend, he's chosen radio silence over clarifying his position. And, apparently, the excuse in his only post explaining the deletion of all the GamerGate stuff was total bunk: I don't hang out at 4chan that much, but all the people that have for the past six years agree that the incidents with which he he parelled this one were less than appropriate citations.
it's that a numerically small but absurdly vocal minority within gamergate lacks any concept of decorum and seems unable to express dissatisfaction with something a prominent woman said/did in a manner other than rape threats and the basest of vulgarities.
So you're skeptical of all the GamerGate claims, but you're absolutely certain of the claims of an underlying, credibility-destroying scum-bagginess coming from their end?
Like Jaburg said, vulgarity and obscenity is nothing new on the internet--and when I say the internet, I mean the INTERNET, and not any one party. You think SJW and friends aren't capable of slander and vitriol--let alone fucking DDos attacks? Or is censorship favorable to vulgarity?
I think all of the evidence thusfar makes it apparent that this goes WAY beyond Quinn, and trying to keep the wedge-issue of rape/death/bomb threats alive serves as an attempt to distract from the larger issue that people are being socially engineered by people like Sarkeesian and the journalists she influences. Quinn is just a crony who ended up blowing their cover.
