I think we all know better than to assume anyone's hands are clean. What I'm getting at is that everyone talks about DJT as though this shitshow was his grand plan all along, that he and the Clintons have been opponents for years and years, and that they don't all ultimately drink from the same financial-sector wells. The Donald was the Clintons' BFF for years, an important DNC donor, who wanted to try something as a stunt and kind of fell backwards into this whole Presidential misadventure. It just so happened that along the way, the wrong people realized how incredibly useful he could be under the right circumstances.
What the fuck does that even mean? In what context are you going to apply the "everybody's corrupt!" meme when Trump didn't have a hand in any political fuckery like Hilldog did?
The telling aspect of your disingenuous screed is that you don't expand upon any tacit claims of corruption, but rather you just cast aspersions, comfortable in the perception that it attributes to your character a form of pseudo-enlightenment that no one could possibly contradict because "everybody's corrupt".
And, of course, you have even less evidence that he was never serious about running in the first place, but you'll run with that narrative to justify your critique, and general dislike, of the ilk that supported and campaigned for him. It seems a far more realistic conclusion that you're still simply bitter about his win, which has permanently muddled your--and Iggy's--ability to bandy about the word "corrupt" and take for granted it's credibility in the context of politics. Unfortunately for your (and Iggy's) ego(s), Trump's private citizen status--juxtaposed with the incomparably evil character of the Clintons--nullifies the feasibility of your premises: "Hi! I'm Donald Trump. And I'm gonna run for president against the world's most powerful crime family--and win--while risking death, disgrace, and slander in the process because they and I were allies all along. Impressive scheme don't you think?"
