You understand that you are in no position to be a credible judge. Again 13 years of your "work". You always go after the person more than doing the debate.
Why are you more credible than G-man? I don't see that he goes for you personally any more than you go after him. I think G-man mostly quotes mainstream sources to cite information for the views he posts. I don't see that he cites any sources as partisan as MediaMatters or RAW, although a good amount of the time you cite mainstream sources too.
There are times where we all get a bit personal when the passions run high. At best, over many years here, I like that despite the more passionate and personal words, there remains a dialogue where both sides present a case for their POV.
Over the acrimony that sometimes occurs, I want to say again that I like you, M E M, and I daresay that you often express yourself with more restraint than I do. And that if we were ever to meet I think we'd like each other and have a pleasant conversation on this and other subjects. But I think it's difficult for both sides to fully understand why the other feels loyalty to what we ourselves oppose. I see the deceit of Obama and the Clintons, the anti-American cultural Marxism of them, where they will literally do ANYTHING to advance their agenda. Objectively, the current Democrats have demonstrably abandoned the Constitution and rule of law, and pick and choose who they prosecute and give a pass to, in service of their own power and political agenda (Manafort and Flynn who did nothing wrong are entrapped into perjury, while Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, clearly guilty of crimes are never similarly deposed to perjure themselves, are given plea deals and a complete free pass). The IRS is weaponized by the Obama administration against Tea Party groups and large Republican donors. FISA requests allow the Obama administration to use NSA and CIA to monitor Trump campaign and Trump administration communication, as opposition research to entrap and destroy the Trump administration. FBI, CIA, State Department, IRS and other federal agencies are dominated by pro-Hillary "Deep-State" Democrats, who are weaponizing these agencies against Republicans, and against the Trump administration in particular, in a complete bypass of the rule of law, and abandonment of equal protection under the law. A free pass system exists for Democrats, a lynch-mob mentality exists for manufacturing a corrupt case against Republicans.
I've cited over and over the things Democrats have done that are undeniably corrupt and indefensible against criticism. Unquestionably, Hillary and Obama and their minions have broken the law, or at best unethically corrupted it. It frankly scares me that Democrats have this level of power, and so shamelessly abuse it. And even worse, that grassroots Democrats have no problem with that abuse! I can easily see at this point a day in the near future where if Democrats regain the Presidency and Senate/House majorities, they would IRS-audit Republicans, deny Republicans employment for their beliefs (in government jobs, or in the private sector), and get police to stand by while Republicans are attacked by liberal mobs. We have already seen that on a limited scale over the last four years or so.
And yet you defend the corrupt abuses of the Democrats. You somehow justify this in your mind. I find that both difficult to understand, and deeply disturbing. Democrats' views are with a level of hatred and ideological zeal that the Nazis went after the Jews in 1930's Germany. I'd say we're at about 1933 levels of lawlessness and hatred. We are moving toward a point where liberals regain control of all branches and unleash a 1939 level of intolerance, violence and suppression of conservative thought.
We already know what Hillary would have done if elected. She would have fired the government officials who exposed her national security -endangering e-mails. What incredible corruption we know, we know ONLY because Trump was elected president. If she were elected, despite the incredible levels of corruption, we would never know! And even so, the "deep state" liberal zealots are doing their best to suppress investigation of the obvious facts. Eventually the pendulum will shift to the Democrats, and all this will be swept under the rug. And it will be open season again on conservatives, as we saw a glimpse of from 2012-2016.
And, unfathomable to me, you seem to endorse that, and welcome whatever gives your DNC buddies power. Rigging debates. Rigging primaries, favoring Hillary over Sanders. Operatives paid $1,500 each to go into Trump rallies and create violence to paint Trump supporters as violent. And openly gloat (video recorded) they are Hillary operatives, deceitfully paid through a "double wall" of deniability, that would be unprovable if not for their self-incriminating gloating. Manipulating FISA requests to use the CIA and NSA to do opposition research surveillance on Trump officials! Weaaponizing the IRS to do audits of Republican individuals and Tea Party and Christian activist groups! Arguably narrowly winning the 2012 election due to this corrupt abuse that ever so slightly tipped the scales 3% or so in their favor.
And you endorse all that. For you to endorse that, for you to give that a free pass, I put you in the same category as Lenin, Trotsy, Stalin, Castro and Mao.
Seriously, how can you possibly look the other way when the Democrats are that corrupt and abusive of Federal power?
Flynn for example did nothing wrong regarding his representation of Trump. FISA surveillance allowed every word of his 5 conversations with the Russian ambassador to be recorded. Meuller's lawyers knew every detail of his interactions with the Russian ambassador, and his interactions were perfectly legal. His only crime was lying under oath to hide some subtle details of his conversations with the Russian ambassador, that were otherwise perfectly legal. Flynn was part of a "transition team" establishing relations with a foreign government the Trump administration would soon be dealing with! Nothing wrong. Knowing in advance EVERY WORD of Flynn's conversation (through corrupt FISA surveillance by the CIA) the only purpose of his deposition was NOT to acquire information, but to trap him in his own words on a technicality and use that manufactured perjury to leverage him. Even as Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, James Comey and Rod Rosenstein get a free pass.
