And in the case of Manafort, what he is being further indicted for STILL has absolutely nothing to do with Trump or Russia. Charges for influencing witnesses, a crime that would not even exist if not for the manufactured perjury charges he is being forced to accept a plea-bargain to.
The case against Manafort was something that was deemed by DOJ as not worth pursuing in 2005. Only when they could use it as a pretense to indict Manafort as a pawn to leverage against Trump was it re-opened. And the FISA surveillance that the case was re-opened to spy on Manafort with was filed by Comey and McCabe based solely on the Russia Dossier THEY KNEW to be falsified evidence. Therefore the surveillance is fruit of the poisoned tree and should be thrown out of court. And Comey and McCabe, who submitted false evidence to a judge, malicious prosecution, falsifying evidence, might well be the ones in the dock facing prosecution, rather than Manafort. That's without even going into the Judge Rudolf Contreras, who in addition to being the judge in the Michael Flynn case (who recused himself suspiciously AFTER he secured a conviction of Flynn!), could also be one of the secret-court unidentified FISA judges who approved one of the multiple warrants for surveillance of Trump officials which (AGAIN) were submitted by Comey and McCabe on evidence they KNEW to be false.