Following up on my January 18th post to this topic, I still look at Vice President Mike Pence's option to not certify the illegal state electors from 6 contested states as the moment that could have changed the election.
It is for Mike Pence to Judge whether a Presidential Election Was Held at All December 26, 2020 American Thinker By Ted Noel
On January 6, a joint session of Congress will open with Vice President Pence presiding as president of the Senate. His power will be plenary and unappealable. You heard that right. As president of the Senate, every objection, comes directly to him, and he can rule any objection “out of order” or “denied.” His task will be to fulfill his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and to ensure that the laws be faithfully executed. This is a high standard of performance, and V.P. Pence will have two choices. He can roll over on “certified” electors, or he can uphold the law.
At the very least, it would have begun 10 days of televised Senate debate, that would have broken through the wall of liberal media and social media suppression, and in televised debates exposed the actual facts of election fraud that have been hidden from the public, that would inevitably have raised public support of a challenge to the fraudulent outcome. And that opposition is already at 51% of Americans (including 48% of independents and 30% of Democrats) despite the mainstream suppression of the facts. How much more an overwhelming majority, if Pence had done the right thing on Jan 6th ?
