You should apologize for using facts and OAN in the same sentence. Also of note, one of your sources won a court dismissal of a case by arguing that no rational person would take his bloviating seriously. Yet, here you are...taking it...seriously.
More factless insults. OAN, like every other news agency, occasionally honestly gets the facts wrong and offers a retraction.
As I cited earlier, OAN often cites facts reported by CNN, Washington Post and Politico, to
PROVE that what those liberal networks now dismiss as "right-wing conspiracy theories" , they as recently as Dec 2019 CNN, Politico and N Y Times reported as FACTS that Dominion voting machines can be easily hacked and present a threat of stealing an election.
Likewise,
Democrat Senators Amy Klobuchar and Ron Wyden wrote a letter (along with one Democrat House member) to the then-attorney general, voicing their alarm about the vulnerability to our election machines to hacking and foreign manipulation. Then a year or so later, corrupt grifting "China Joe" Biden wins the Nov 2020 election, and POOF, their concerns just disappear, despite massive evidence of election fraud. Rather than audit the election ballots and machines, they want to censure Republican Senators Cruz and Hawley who just requested on Jan 6th an audit examination of the integrity of the ballots. Which is precisely what the ballots are held 2 years for. Some of which ballots the Democrats have already shredded or wiped the memory cards for. What are they hiding? It iss lawful to do a re-count and audit.
As
Sharyl Attkisson cited, other liberal media agencies have altogether abandoned objective news coverage for full-out liberal activism, and increasingly just secretly delete or re-write their online articles, rather than offer an honest retraction. In true Orwellian style, their Ministry of Truth conforms their reporting to the Party's updated current message. And burn the originals.
I've already cited abundant evidence of election fraud. And in Michigan, in Pennsylvania, in Antrim County, New Hampshire, in Montana, in Atlanta, in Maricopa County, Arizona, there is more evidence of election fraud surfacing and harder to deny, every day.
As I recall the court case was against Tucker Carlson, and against a defamation case his lawyer argued that it was clearly opinion and not intended to be mistaken as absolute fact. I believe Rachel Maddow used the same argument when she was sued. Because Carlson could not
prove conclusively it (PLAYBOY model Karen McDougal extorting Trump) was true, does NOT prove conclusively that it WASN'T true, only that it legally fit in the realm of opinion/commentary, and he argued that to avoid getting sued.
Carlson has the highest-viewed program in cable history, so he obviously is doing something right. As I said about a week ago, I don't always agree with Tucker or like his style, but more often than not he provides informative commentary.
Likewise Maria Bartiromo, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hann ity, Jesse Waters, Pat Buchanan, OAN and many others I I read or listen to. No one sparkles 100% of the time.
But certainly, all of these do far better than the deliberate false narratives of CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post and Politico.
