History proves you wrong but I accept that you will keep being the partisan you are. For me after seeing the same game played over and over again I just will no longer support deficit reduction. Republicans don’t do it when they have control of all 3 branches so you are a fool to expect democrats to be more conservative than your shitty anti democracy party.
"History" does NOT prove me wrong.
The facts I cited prove YOU wrong, despite your best efforts at a lying scapegoat Bolshevik narrative.
I'm sorry that you are immune to the information and facts I cited, repeatedly. It is Democrats who are the prime movers of deficit spending, although I can concede that a large ratio of Republicans likewise enrich themselves in the lobbyist and campaign-finance system. The two-party system is largely a one-party system, controlled by campaign finance by corporations, to buy the policy and leaders they want. Again, that case is well made in the book
Obamanomics by Timothy Carney.
When Republicans did control both houses in 1996 and 1997, they forced Bill Clinton against his will to sign a balanced budget agreement, and a "workfare" reform of the welfare system. Gingrich orchestrated actual reduction in spending. That ended with the 9-11-2001 attacks, and unavoidable increased spending for homeland security and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. George W. Bush's presidency from 2001-2009 was a break from Reagan conservativism, who was a big-government Republican (i.e., a RINO) who I did not vote for in 2000, and only voted for in 2004 because the Democrat alternative was even worse. Bush did some things right, and a lot wrong that I vocally disagreed with on these boards during his term.
Pat Buchanan made a case against this in his 2004 book
Where the Right Went Wrong and accurately predicted it would hurt the Republican brand, as happened in the 2006 and 2008 elections where the Democrats gained majorities in both houses, and Obama gained the presidency, before quickly showing the Democrat-Bolsheviks were not a better alternative an lost the House by a huge margin in 2010. Only because of Democrat-Bolshevik weaponization of the IRS against tea Party and religious conservative groups, and to intimidate and crush large Republican donors like Frank Vandersloot, did Obama narrowly win a second term in 2012.
I've cited the examples where Trump wanted less spending, and Democrats forced hundreds of billions in additional spending, more than double the spending, added on before they would fund rebuilding our military. That is not "Trump spending" that is clearly Democrat spending, despite how you insanely and irrationally try to spin it, ignoring the actual facts.
