Oh, god...you insinuated I teach the 1619 Project. How cute!
You know I don't have to disprove anything you said about leftists and may even agree with some of it...and can still believe that Trump got thumped, right?
Do I know that?
The problem is you never clarify your views, or say anything clearly. You don't express what you believe and why, you just engage in namecalling and say I'm an idiot for holding my clearly detailed linked and sourced views.
You pretended to in the first year you posted here to be a reader of Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul supporter. But you express contempt for the Tea Party and Donald Trump supporters ,who are both the direct outgrowth of those two political figures. I would argue that Pat Buchanan's book DEATH OF THE WEST (2002) is the exact outline of the platform Trump got elected on. I would be very surprised if Donald Trump had not read it and used it as the basis for his policy, both in the 2016 campaign and in his 4 years as president. Jonathan Swan (then of the National Review) selecting his winners for the week on Fox News with Brett Baier on the Friday after the election, cited Pat Buchanan as his winner for the week, saying that "Pat Buchanan has been championing the issues Trump won on for the last 25 years. And a Trump presidency is the next best thing to a Buchanan presidency."
In every presidential election, in every midterm for over 12 years, you always , ALWAYS support some obscure Republican who gets maybe 1% or 2% of the vote, and who generally bashes the other Republicans. So... you basically only support Republicans who can't win, have no following, and on top of that bash all other Republicans.
So unless you can clarify what the hell it is you actually believe, it seems to me that you're a thinly veiled Democrat.
And the fact that you're a junior college professor further makes it about a 90% likelihood you're a Democrat leftist. Only about 7% of college professors polled self-identify as "conservative".
As I've explained repeatedly, Trump was winning on election night until 3 AM, at which point FOR THE FIRST TIME IN U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION HISTORY, THE VOTE COUNT WAS SUSPENDED SIMULTANEOUSLY IN 7 STATES.
But again, they didn't even do that, they only sent the Republican observers home, and CONTINUED COUNTING ALL NIGHT LONG, WITH ONLY DEMOCRATS PRESENT, NO REPUBLICAN OBSERVERS. At which point a statistically improbable 96% to 100% of the votes suddenly were all going in Biden's favor, the precise time Biden spiked ahead and "won". Biden, the uncharismatic inarticulate boob who couldn't complete a sentence in his stump speeches, who couldn't draw 100 people to any of his rallies, got more votes than any candidate in history.
Biden, who incredibly got more black votes than Barack Obama did. But only in a few specific urban areas in the 6 contested states, and only after 3 AM on election night, AFTER the Republican observers were sent home.
Yeah...
That doesn't make sense, and there are all kinds of measures I've cited, and more I haven't, that demonstrate how much more likely a rigged 2020 election is, and how unlikely an actual Biden victory is.
