Your evidence was rejected on the merits in 30 cases. Your evidence sucks. Cope harder.
A number of judges, states, local election officials and audits, also held up that there was clear evidence of election fraud in cases, and/or tampering with Dominion voting machines. As in examples previously cited in rural Michigan, and even in places such as Montana and New Hampshire.
So you're cherry picking cases when you say "30 cases rejected", 30 isn't all of them. Not ALL judgements went against those who filed cases of election fraud.
The most disappointing was when chief justice John Roberts wouldn't let the U S S C hear the cases, and it was clear he refused because he is afraid of controversy involving the U S Supreme Court in possible involvement in a presidential election, as there was in 2000. Which is a sad and cowardly political decision, not a judicial decision based on the rule of law. As I recall, Justice Clarence Thomas said that the U S S C should have heard the case. I don't know if Samuel Alito also made a public statement, but at least behind the scenes he also wanted the cases heard by the U S S C.
