Just curious, after refreshing myself on the "Central Park Five" case....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_jogger_caseThe Central Park jogger case (events also referenced as the Central Park Five Case) was a criminal case in the United States over the aggravated assault and rape of a white woman in Manhattan's Central Park on April 19, 1989, occurring at the same time as an unrelated string of other attacks in the park the same night.[1]
Five black and Latino youths (known as the Central Park Five, later the Exonerated Five) were convicted of assaulting the woman, and served sentences ranging from six to twelve years. All later had their charges vacated after a prison inmate confessed to the crime.
From the outset the case was a topic of national interest. Initially, it fueled public discourse about New York City's perceived lawlessness, criminal behavior by youths, and violence toward women. After the exonerations, the case became a prominent example of racial profiling, discrimination, and inequality in the legal system and the media.[2][3][4][5] All five defendants subsequently sued the City of New York for malicious prosecution, racial discrimination, and emotional distress; the city settled the suit in 2014 for $41 million.
...you rant about Rep. Matt Gaetz being guilty no matter what, by comparing his case to five guys who were maliciously prosecuted and later vindicated, who sued the city for 41 million over their malicious prosecution?
Yeah, makes sense...
