Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
And WB’s links are almost always something along the lines of low information/ high partisan blog style. There might be a kernel of truth here and there but nothing that supports the long rants and endless conspiracy theories spun. We already know how republicans respond when it’s one of their own involved in breaking the law btw. It’s on full display with Trump before our eyes. He got tried and was judged by a jury of his peers and the one moderate republican that dared to say the rule of law needs to be respected was quickly put in his place. The rule of law is no longer something acceptable to the gop if it’s their guy.

You are SUCH a fucking liar.

Looking through the above topics, my links include:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...chief-blinken-triggered-letter-discredit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Files
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Chansley
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...chief-blinken-triggered-letter-discredit
https://dailycaller.com/2023/04/06/informants-january-6-proud-boys/
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...olitical-donations-went-hillary-clinton/
https://heavy.com/news/tarik-khalid-johnson/
https://nypost.com/2023/09/19/fbi-l...ormants-at-capitol-on-jan-6-ex-official/
https://nypost.com/2023/09/19/ray-e...emeanor-for-jan-6-protest-at-us-capitol/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/se...cans-prior-2020-election-jim-jordan-says
https://alphanews.org/kamala-harris-fund/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-political-to-help-biden-win/ss-AA1bdlbh
https://www.mrc.org/media-bias-101-what-journalists-really-think-and-what-public-thinks-about-them

MANY of my linked sources definitely NOT Republican leaning sources, but still acknowledging the undeniable facts you try to pretend don't exist.
Even the more overtly conservative sources I post are citing undeniable sourced facts, with cited sources.
I would hardly call Washington Examiner, Wikipedia, NY Post, BBC, Heavy.com, MSN and others "right wing" or relentlessly pro-Trump sources.
Mollie Hemingway, Julie Kelly, John Solomon, Sharyl Attkisson, Miranda Devine, and Maria Bartiromo are well-respected award-winning invesigative reporters with decades of experience, definitely NOT conspiracy theorists who write articles that "might have a kernel of truth"
And "we" DON'T know "how republicans respond when it’s one of their own involved in breaking the law btw", whatever that baseless comment implies with nothing to back it up.

IRS, DOJ, FBI, CIA and State Department, since a least he Obama years, are infested with almost 100% Democrats, who EVEN WHEN TRUMP WAS PRESIDENT disobeyed executive orders and pursued their own agenda, with an open hatred for Trump in particular, and for Republicans in general.
And these federal agencies unleashed the power of the state on Tulsi Gabbard, Alan Dershowitz, Sharyl Attkisson, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Bernie Sanders, and on anyone else who gets in their way, Democrat, Republican, Independent, journalist, whatever.
And as even their own texts and social media comments reveal (Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, etc.) they have absolutely no reservations about abusing their federal position and state power to punish or destroy their law-abiding political opposition.
[Linked Image from rushlimbaugh.com]

You are just being blatantly dishonest and a Democrat-Bolshevik propagandist, in smearing both the legitimate sources I cite, and smearing me personally.