It's actually five professors: Three American professors, and two English/South Africans at Oxford.
While the first two are hard to understand, they talk so fast, they still manifest well what I'm sure they do in the classroom, ramming their self-righteous liberal views down he throats of their students, with a very my-way-or-the-highway intolerance. And while each tried initially to come off as neutral, objective, and "just the facts", each quickly revealed themselves to have a less than objective inability to even listen to the fact that Trump could be right, and be pursuing unprecedentedly good policy, to rebuild the country and make us the global leader for the next century. Or for these professors even be open to any facts at all that diverge from their liberal orthodoxy.
Despite the last Brit lady saying "Entertainment is on his side for you [pointing at Charlie Kirk] , and education is on this side for you [pointing to the snooty academics on her side]", she quickly manifests herself to be emotionally unhinged, bristling with partisan contempt, and makes one unsubstantiated insinuation after another, that Charlie Kirk, when finally permitted to respond, quickly corrects beautifully with the actual facts.
I thought the 3rd American professor came off the best, and the first older British professor. But in all cases, their biases, and at many points their often explosive outbursts of uncontrollable contempt, gave away their inability to break their own programming, unable to even listen to arguments and supporting facts in favor of Trump's actions and policy.
