Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Tom Holman apparently accepted a bag of cash and the doj dropped the case. On the other hand they rushed to get Comey indicted after Trump demanded it. They had to fire someone that said there wasn’t enough evidence and install a Trump lawyer to do it but they got it done.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
As I said you present conspiracy theories as fact. When you get called out on an obvious lie like Obama arresting reporters you say your lie is splitting hairs. We watched what happened in 2020 and the crowd trying to get into the capital wasn’t peaceful. Law enforcement did get injured as the crowd attacked them. Compare that to Harris losing this last one. Democrats accepted the loss and didn’t try to overturn the results.

And that is the first election in 24 years Democrats haven't challenged and falsely poisoned confidence in our institutions when they lost, with false narratives about how Republicans "stole" the election.

And you further lie, there was a lot of violence by Democrats during Bush's inaugurations, during Trump's first inauguration, I've posted video of it here before, thousands of Democrat activists rioting, vandalizing, burning, on streets around Trump's drive to the inauguration.

Democrats didn't challenge the election in Jan 2025, ONLY because Trump won decisively in a landslide, and Dems could neither credibly challenge the electoral vote, or the popular vote, as they did in 2000, 2004, and 2016, literally every election they lost.

As I've said repeatedly, the "un-peaceful transfer" in Jan 2021 is just a lying Democrat narrative. Events at the Capitol were a false-flag operation set up by a Democrat-weaponized Trump-hating 97% Democrat-donating FBI, and its false-flag agents. And considering how hard undercover FBI and Capitol police pushed Trump supporters to riot, it's incredible how few incidents there were, how overwhelmingly peaceful Trump supporters were that day.

Far from "right wing conspiracy theory", evidence has been leaking out about what ACTUALLY happened on January 6th, for 4 years, and I've linked it all along as it was reported. And now here is an enormous revelation about the 274 FBI agents now PROVEN to have been framing Trump supporters on January 6th :

https://www.theblaze.com/news/fbi-h...n-jan-6-crowds-congressional-source-says

FACT.




Originally Posted by M E M
This is all retreads but again there’s things that are now very acceptable within the Republican Party that wouldn’t fly within the Democrat Party. A president freeing those that assaulted law enforcement for him. Jokes about Pelosi being violently assaulted. An evangelical Trump supporter assassinating democrats, we get more jokes. And then you have republican influencers like the late Charlie Kirk who called for President Biden to be charged with treason and executed. This is who your party wants to call a patriot? Someone that is yelling at a mob to kill police officers shouldn’t be working in the DOJ. You have no ethics that allow for this to happen other than whatever helps keep your party in power.

"That wouldn't fly in the Democrat party..." lol lol lol

You are the party of BLM, Antifa, open borders, and attacking ICE agents and their families nationwide.
You are the party of burning Teslas.
You are the party that hates cops and wants to "de-fund the police".


In the case of James Rosen, the {Democrat weaponized] FBI indicted him specifically for reporting about the Obama White House, investigating the Obama administration and using White House sources, as reporters have done for at least a century. The Obama administration, with their weaponized FBI, threatened him with an indictment and pending arrest and prosecution beyond the indictment, and that was not only to specifically intimidate and silence investigative reporters like James Rosen,NY news agency, but also to intimidate their White House sources IN A WAY THAT NO PREVIOUS WHITE HOUSE HAS DONE, NOT EVEN THE NIXON ADMINISTRATION, EVEN ACCORDING TO LIBERAL MEDIA REPORTERS WHO HAD COVERED THE WHITE HOUSE FOR OVER 40 YEARS.

So fuck yes, you are splitting hairs, and trying to evade that the Democrats have weaponized government.

It began in earnest during the Obama years.
It continued all through Trump's first term,( "Viva la resistance", said FBI agent Kevin Clinesmith in his group texts to Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and other like-minded Democrat-Bolsheviks inside the FBI) . And it continued and even ramped up during Joe Biden's 4 years.
During Trump's first term and the Biden administration, a Democrat-weaponized FBI, arrested and imprisoned multiple cabinet members of Donald Trump. They arrested Trump himself FOUR TIMES in the last 3 years, they arrested and jailed his cabinet members, his valet, Trump real estate organization employees, arrested 1,500 overwhelmingly peaceful January 6h protesters, arrested hundreds abortion activists, arrested parents at PTA meetings for just speaking out against Democrat / "woke" indoctrination of their children in schools, ALL in a mass effort to intimidate and silence any dissent. To pave he way for a one-party Democrat-Bolshevik system, to replace our Constitutional republic.

So don't even TRY to float the B.S. narrative that it didn't happen. It sure as fucking hell DID happen.




And Donald Trump set free the January 6th prisoners because over 90% of them did absolutely nothing wrong.
And the few who did commit acts of vandalism or clashed with police, had already spent 2 to 4 years in prison when Trump pardoned or commuted their sentences. They were over-charged and over-sentenced, so Trump let them out for time served, because anyone who did the same crimes outside of the Capitol on January 6th, in any other city, would have served less time than they did serve for the same crimes. And the [Democrat-weaponized] FBI's piling on and over-charging was way beyond what they would have gotten in a normal and non-weaponized justice system.
All done by Democrats in FBI and DOJ to feed a false narrative of "dangerous white supremacist Trump supporters".

For roughly 20 years, leaders in the Democrat Party have gotten a free pass from the 97% Democrat-donating FBI, as in the cases of Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, Houma Abedin, Jennifer Palmieri,, Barack Obama, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, on and on.

Don't feed me the garbage about the Democrat Party having superior principles and rule of law. For the Democrat-Bolshevik party, their ONLY principle is what keeps them in power.

The Democrat-Bolshevik FBI scuttled the multiple cases against Hillary Clinton, even though she was guilty as sin. The Peter Strzoks and the James Comeys deliberately corrupted the evidence and let the statute of limitations run out on each case, so that these Democrats COULDN'T be prosecuted, despite being guilty as sin.
And a Democrat-weaponized FBI set a perjury trap for Michael Flynn to frame him for fake crimes, while they simultaneously broke FBI protocol and DIDN'T EVEN RECORD Hillary Clinton's FBI deposition, so that she could never be prosecuted for perjury, to clear her path to run for President.
Democrat-Bolshevik FBI protected Hillary Clinton from her own ACTUAL perjury, and manufactured fake perjury to set up and prosecute Michael Flynn.

And this is just one of thousands of examples of what the 97% Democrat=donating weaponized FBI did, to protect Democrats and maliciously prosecute Republicans for fake crimes. By the thousands. For 20 years.

And then conversely in the case of Trump and his cabinet members, MADE UP fake evidence and perjury traps, created "novel" cases that no one else has ever been prosecuted for, and never will be again, for anyone other than Donald Trump. And you have absolutely no shame about that.

Your evil Democrat-Bolshevik party is corrupt to the core.There is no principle among Democrats, there is only what will get them in power. "Show me the man, and I will give you the crime" , as Beria, the head of Stalin's secret police said when asked to manufacture charges. As Comey's and Wray's FBI did.
And as I've established in literally hundreds of other posts here, the Bolsheviks in your party (the Clintons, the Obamas, Elizabeth Warren, AOC and the entire new Democrat generation) worship Communist authoritarianism, and are trying to create that kind of one-party regime in the United States.

And incredibly, you can plainly see all this, and you act like it's THE REPUBLICANS who did something wrong.
No.
The Republicans are doing what has to be done, to clean out 20 years of PROVEN Democrat-Bolshevik weaponization of government.
And if Democrats ever regain power, specifically the Presidency, they will immediately re-weaponize every branch of government and begin another purge.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
You’re the one supporting the authoritarian WB. As already exposed, the 274 agents were dispatched after Trumpers starting rioting.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
You’re the one supporting the authoritarian WB. As already exposed, the 274 agents were dispatched after Trumpers starting rioting.

That's another bogus false narrative, M E M.

And a weak one.





Originally Posted by Wonder Boy
.


Glenn Greenwald interviewing investigative journalist Julie Kelly, on the unfair treatment, malicious prosecution for non-crimes like "trespassing" and "parading", and a Democrat-run FBI doing so just to shut down their Republican opposition, in a fake war on non-existent "right wing domestic terror".

Jan 6th prosecutions proceed with little attention - Interview with journalist Julie Kelly



At the time of this interview in April 2022, Merrrick Garland's DOJ and FBI had only arrested 800 protesters. And Julie Kelly cites that her sources believed would continue arrests till they had over 1,000 Jan 6th prisoners, just to feed their Democrat political narrative, of a continuing national threat from "dangerous violent right wing Trump supporters".

They went on to arrest over 1,500 political prisoners, and the arrests went on a few new ones a week, right up till the day Trump was inaugurated on Jan 20 2025.


Originally Posted by Wonder Boy
.




FBI had 274 plainclothes agents embedded in Jan. 6 crowds, congressional source says
https://www.theblaze.com/news/fbi-h...n-jan-6-crowds-congressional-source-says


  • JOSEPH M. HANNEMAN and STEVE BAKER, SEPTEMBER 25, 2025



    Disclosure by the FBI to Congress answers a long-simmering question but does not reveal what the agents did that day.
    The FBI has acknowledged it had 274 plainclothes agents in the massive crowds on Jan. 6, 2021, more than four and a half years after questions were first raised about the level of FBI involvement that day, Blaze News has learned.

    A senior congressional source said the number is not necessarily a surprise, since the FBI often embeds countersurveillance personnel at large events.

    But given the FBI’s until-now steadfast refusal to disclose the level of its presence at the Capitol, the figure might still be viewed with skepticism in some quarters.

    The news comes in the wake of claims by the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Inspector General that the FBI had no undercover personnel in the Jan. 6 crowds.

    “We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6,” the DOJ OIG said in an 88-page report released in December 2024.


    Depending how one reads “undercover” agents versus “plainclothes agents,” both statements could be true.

    The same report disclosed that 26 FBI confidential human sources were in the Jan. 6 crowds, four of whom entered the Capitol.

    The DOJ inspector general said only three of the FBI informants had been assigned by the bureau to come to Washington and report on “domestic terrorism subjects who were possibly attending the event.”

    Of the 26 informants, four entered the Capitol during Jan. 6 protests and rioting, the OIG report said. None was authorized by the FBI to break the law or enter a restricted area, “nor was any CHS directed by the FBI to encourage others to commit illegal acts on January 6,” the report said.

    Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), the chairman of the new House Jan. 6 Select Subcommittee, has also expressed determination to drill down on the FBI presence and roles of agents and informants on Jan. 6.

    “But with that many paid informants being in the crowd, we want to know how many were in the crowd, how many were in the building, but I also want to know, were they paid to inform or instigate?” Loudermilk said in a Sept. 23 appearance on "Just the News."

    In a May 2024 court filing, former Jan. 6 defendant William Pope listed nearly 50 FBI agents and others working under the bureau’s auspices on Jan. 6 — such as officers from the Joint Terrorism Task Force, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, U.S. Army counterintelligence, and other agents who later wrote probable-cause affidavits for Jan. 6 arrest warrants.

    It is not clear whether those personnel would be part of the 274 employees disclosed to Congress by the FBI.

    The FBI has repeatedly rebuffed attempts by Congress to determine the bureau’s level of involvement in the Jan. 6 crowds, either by its own agents or confidential human sources, also known as informants.

    The disclosure is unlikely to tamp down questions by former Jan. 6 defendants and others who have long questioned whether FBI personnel took part in, or at least incited, rioting in the crowds.

    Undercover Metropolitan Police Department officers have acknowledged inciting the crowds by helping protesters climb over barriers, encouraging them to continue on to the Capitol, and applauding those committing vandalism.

    Most of the video footage shot by dozens of undercover MPD officers on Jan. 6 has never been made public, despite attempts by Pope to dislodge the number through court motions in his Jan. 6 criminal case.

    The FBI also had tactical teams at the Capitol who responded to help clear the building after Ashli Babbitt was shot outside the Speaker’s Lobby at 2:44 p.m. Other tactical units from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and U.S. Marshals were also on site.





What was dismissed as "MAGA fantasy" has again been proven to be absolutely true.

The 97% Democrat-donating FBI are very evasive about what they were there for. They denied they were even there, for years.
Then they admitted to 26 undecover agents in the Capitol Jan 6 crowds.

Now they admit to 274 "plainclothes" agents in the crowd (disguised as Trump supporters).
Christopher Wray and Jill Sanborn won't answer the most basic questions about why undercover FBI agents were there. But against their best efforts to keep hiding their purpose on Jan 6th, the facts are gradually coming out.
I think quite obviously, this rabidly Trump-hating 97% Democrat-donating FBI were there to frame and manipulate the Trump protesters that day, into something they never would have done without false-flag manipulation.
Or were just framed for, and didn't do at all.

A crowd of thousands just waving flags peacefully on Jan 6th at the Capitol, while police (or false-flag FBI) fire tear gas and concussion grenades over and over into that peaceful crowd, and see what they finally do in response. And there are at least 20 "Trump protesters" who were taped in Capitol surveillance video that day, who had their photos up for a day or so on FBI's tips website, who FBI took down despite heir never being idenified. And despite face-recognition technology, despite geo-fencing that could identify them by their cel phone, they were never identified by FBI.
Because the FBI doesn't WANT them identified, because they are the FBI's own false-flag agents.


Julie Kelly, who has been investigating this daily for almost 5 years, says otherwise, and has for over 4 years.

The beginning of rioting (orchestrated by false-flag undercover FBI and Capitol police, firing tear gas and concussion grenades over and over into PEACEFUL crowds just standing around waving flags, to agitate them to fight back), started outside the Capitol around 12:40 PM.
The first breach of rioters inside the Capitol was about 2:15 PM

Ashli Babbit (UNARMED) was shot by a Capitol officer at 2:45 PM
Trump gave a videotaped social media speech at 4:10 PM, instructing his supporters to go home, which they immediately did.

So ... when exactly did FBI organize and send these 274 "plainclothes" FBI agents ?!?
Your narrative is complete bullshit, and has absolutely nothing to back it up.

FBI just said "plainclothes" because they DIDN'T want to say "undercover", and explain that FBI agents were there disguised as Trump supporters, to FRAME them.

You could not call up, organize and send out 274 FBI "plainclothes" agents in less than 4 hours AFTER the rioting began.
Your narrative is absolute shit garbage.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Not my narrative but Kash Patel’s. Trump is lying.


Fair play!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
Tom Holman apparently accepted a bag of cash and the doj dropped the case. On the other hand they rushed to get Comey indicted after Trump demanded it. They had to fire someone that said there wasn’t enough evidence and install a Trump lawyer to do it but they got it done.

It’s apparently ok for republicans to accept bribes now.


Fair play!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 19,685
Likes: 14
brother from another mother
15000+ posts
brother from another mother
15000+ posts
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 19,685
Likes: 14
Apparently or is there any proof of this?


"My friends have always been the best of me." -Doctor Who

"Well,whenever I'm confused,I just check my underwear. It holds most answers to life's questions." Abe Simpson

I can tell by the position of the sun in the sky, that is time for us to go. Until next time, I am Lothar of the Hill People!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
.






Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
He literally accepted a bag of cash in sting operation. Under any other administration he would be gone and probably worrying about jail time.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
.



https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/doj-ended-probe-border-czar-tom-homan-allegedly/story?id=125781386


Quote
The investigation, started during the Biden administration, was handed over to the Trump administration. Officials briefed Justice Department leadership about it in the early days of Trump’s presidency as part of their ongoing efforts to vet personnel who had been appointed to senior leadership posts in his administration, the sources said.


The investigation, first reported by MSNBC and The New York Times, began in 2024 and was based out of the Western District of Texas.

Tha sounds like a Biden / Merrick Garland DOJ trying to set up and smear a Trump official, right BEFORE the Trump administration was even inaugurated.

And the fact that some of the most Trump-unfriendly media were the ones immediately informed by FBI, is reminiscent of the Democrat-weaponized FBI and DOJ calling CNN and other far-left media to be right there on hand for the show-arrests of Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Roger Stone and Peter Navarro.
Roger Stone in particular had home security video cameras, and they recorded that CNN's camera crew arrived exactly 18 minutes before FBI pounded on Stone's door to arrest him. That Roger Stone describes as "the shortest stakeout in media history"

OBVIOUSLY indiividuals in FBI called and informed CNN to be there for Stone's arrest, in a partisan-motivated arrest, and made sure CNN was there to give it maximum coverage and scandal for Trump's firs-term administration, as were the other arrests.

Roger Stone said his own lawyer's discovery investigation showed that arrest, with 29 heavily armed FBI agents, and 2 frogmen who swam up in Roger Stone's waterfront back yard, cost 1.1 million dollars. They knew in advance that Roger Stone was absolutely no threat, and FBI could have just phoned him and told him to be in FBI's local office with an attorney at an appointed time, at ZERO taxpayer cost. But the 97% Democrat-donating FBI wanted a televised show arrest, for purely political reasons.
Which is precisely why FBI did a corruption sting on Tom Homan. Not to find anything Homan actually did wrong, but to set him up, to SMEAR him, and by extension to smear Trump. As a corrupt FBI has attempted over and over to Trump in the last 10 years. And it's telling that this sting was unleashed at the very end of 2024, by a Biden / Merrick Garland controlled FBI. Because it was one last dirty trick to smear Trump, before the Democrats lost control of the White House and the DOJ / FBI. That's all this is.

Quote
..., in a statement to ABC News, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed the probe and said it "was subjected to a full review by FBI agents and Justice Department prosecutors. They found no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing."

"The Department’s resources must remain focused on real threats to the American people, not baseless investigations. As a result, the investigation has been closed," Patel and Blanche said in their statement to ABC News.

White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson criticized the probe as a "blatantly political investigation, which found no evidence of illegal activity, [and] is yet another example of how the Biden Department of Justice was using its resources to target President Trump’s allies rather than investigate real criminals and the millions of illegal aliens who flooded our country."

Jackson further said Homan has not been involved in any decisions by the White House to award government contracts.

"He is a career law enforcement officer and lifelong public servant who is doing a phenomenal job on behalf of President Trump and the country," Jackson added.

The ABC article (which is still Trump-hating liberal media, despite the facts they selectively include) neglects to say that Tom Homan is a lifelong law enforcement officer, and served in border enforcement under 6 presidents, that he has proven to be hell-bent on securing the border, and that is precisely why Trump appointed him. That Homan had a good-paying private business that he left to come back as border czar, that he DIDN'T NEED a $50,000 bribe at the time the sting was offered to him, and doesn't need it now. That he endures more death threats than anyone else in the Trump administration, and he could easily go back to a better-paying and less risky job if money was his motivation.
AND that the FBI and DOJ setting him up, and the liberal media reporting it, are among those who would most like to see him removed, by any vicious scheme they can manufacture.

Kash Patel , Todd Blanche, and an army of DOJ lawyers investigating the case say there is "no credible evidence" for the Homan investigation. And that's good enough for me.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
I’m sure it’s good enough for you. The guy still literally accepted a bag of cash with a corrupt DOJ dropping the case.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
I’m sure it’s good enough for you. The guy still literally accepted a bag of cash with a corrupt DOJ dropping the case.

You're such a lying sack of shit, M E M. You are fronting a bumper-sticker false narrative, with NOTHING to back it up, except the allegation.

You slander Tom Homan, who has been in border security for over 40 years, and who literally is under death threats every day from drug cartels, and from lefttis/Marxist Antifa and "anti-ICE" terrorists your maniac party incites to violence, with their rhetoric every day. Slandering Homan just because you think it somehow bolsters the Democrat-Bolshevik party. The exact same Tom Homan that Barack Obama gave a presidential medal to, for doing the same deportation of illegals job under Obama, that Homan is now demonized for doing under Trump.

Your party has lived day to day for the last 35-plus years on deception, lies, false narratives, intimidation and violence.
In every way the Orwellian manifestation of communist revolution.
From Bill and Hillary Clinton, to Barack and Michelle Obama, to Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, to A O-C and Mamdani, your party is built on deception and lies, and Marxist ideology.
And slander.

What's "good enough for me" is that Patel and the DOJ have investigated the Homan allegation and found it to be without evidence, and clearly a frame set up by the previous Democrat-Bolshevik-run FBI under Biden and Merrick Garland.
Unlike the evil stuff that went on for the previous four years where Democrats in FBI buried the evidence to let their Democrat friends escape prosecution, Trump has appointed Kash Patel and Pam Bondi to clean out over 20 years of FBI and DOJ corruption, and to re-establish the rule of law. NOT to give their friends a free pass.
If Homan were truly guilty of anything, they would prosecute him without hesitation, not give him a free pass just because he has an "R" next to his name (as Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and all their family and aides have been protected from prosecution by Democrat-Bolsheviks in FBI and DOJ for 10 years) .

Trump similarly fired Michael Flynn in Jan 2017, not knowing that Flynn was framed in a Democrat/FBI conspiracy. It's just TOO suspicious that Homan was alleged by the same corrupt FBI to be guilty of crimes, when (just like Flynn) Homan was a guy the Democrat-Bolsheviks fiercely wanted to leverage out.
TOO convenient.
And not just deemed insufficient evidence to prosecute, according to Patel, but by dozens of other DOJ investigators. These investigators also found insufficient evidence to prosecute Homan.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Pam Bondi couldn’t even answer questions about Homan accepting the bag of cash yesterday. Homan, you might have noticed didn’t deny taking the cash either. The corruption is right there for everyone to see.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,346
Likes: 38
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
Pam Bondi couldn’t even answer questions about Homan accepting the bag of cash yesterday. Homan, you might have noticed didn’t deny taking the cash either. The corruption is right there for everyone to see.


What are you smoking?
I've seen Tom Homan over and over say these are false charges, and that the FBI and DOJ dropped the case because of a lack of evidence.
Not just Tom Homan's words, but also Kash Patel's and Pam Bondi's words. And the supporting words of several dozen other DOJ investigators who have looked at the case.

Just look at the video of Homan in my above post, to see what an OBVIOUS lie you are trying to sell.
Another Democrat-Bolshevik party false narrative.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,201
Likes: 80
I have not seen video of Homan actually saying he did not take the bag of money. Pam Bondi also evaded answering that question. All the responses evade directly denying him accepting the bag of money. When Homan accepted the bag of money it was part of an FBI sting operation that was recorded thus they are not willing to say he didn’t accept the bag of money.


Fair play!
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0