.


Pretty much all the districts that Democrats have won are districts that were Democrat already, and not red or purple areas of the country.

Is it disappointing to not see them turn more toward Trump? Yeah.
But these were not areas that had a high probability of turning for a Republican candidate.



And you try to conflate things that are not the true issue. You make it sound like Trump voters are turning on him. They're not, the polls show that. Trump has the most consistent Republican support and voter loyalty of any Republican of my lifetime, INCLUDING Reagan.

The issue is that Republicans are not doing as well in off-term elections where Trump is NOT on the ballot.

As of this writing, Trump has been the elected president for approximately 11 months and 1 and 1/2 weeks. And in that time, he has accomplished miracles you and the Democrat-Bolsheviks will never acknowledge. Trump has moved Heaven and Earth in just 11 months, and he's not even close to done.

He has negotiated peace between at least 8 warring countries.
The economic policies he has already put in place will create factories and jobs, lower taxes and lower interest rates over the next 6 months. This is not stuff Trump is promising to do, it is stuff Trump has ALREADY DONE and alreedy put in motion.
And the economy will continue to improve, gas prices will continue to drop, interest rates will continue to drop (especially after Democrat agent and obstructionist Jerome Powell is gone in May 2026), mortgage rates will increasingly drop, and new home construction will continue to accellerate. All improving the Republican outlook, just in time for the Nov 2026 mid-term elections.



I still recall what Newt Gingrich said in an interview about 6 months before the Nov 2024 presidential election. He said the media was averaging about 92% negative coverage of Trump, and he (Gingrich) had never before seen a candidate who had 92% negative coverage and was still winning in the polls.
And Trump went on to win the 2024 election.
I see things continue to move in Trump's direction.


Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
Democrats won another special election with another huge win in Iowa. This has to be really upsetting for those that voted for Epstein’s best friend[...

lol lol
Such ridiculous lies.

Trump met Epstein publicly a few times at parties, and distanced himself from Epstein 20 years ago now, BEFORE anyone knew what Epstein was about. Trump saw Epstein's association with young girls and distanced himself decades ago, before he married Melania. The ONE time Trump rode on Epstein's "Lolita Express" private plane from New York City to West Palm Beach, as I quoted before, Trump was accompanied by Melania. So there was not even the sllightest opportuntiy for Trump to even be alleged to have sex with Epstein's under-age girls.
Trump saw what Epstein was about, and distanced himself from Epstein.
Trump is well documented throwing Epstein out of Mar A Lago for being inappropriate with an under-age girl, and permanently banned Epstein from the club. 20 years ago

As opposed to 25 flights by Bill Clinton on Epstein's plane, where Clinton had his Secret Service detail stay behind 5 of those times , so as not to be witnesses to Clinton's sexual behavior.
As Hillary Clinton and other Democrats took donations from Harvey Weinstein, and continued to socialize wih Weinstein and Epstein, long after they were accused and convicted.
Democrats who did this, not Trump.

And Epstein continued to be a major fundraiser and bundler for the Democrat party, and having a far more visible and extensive relationship with Bill Clinton. Clinton who went on a documented 25 airline flights with Epstein. It's amazing to me how all the evidence points to Bill Clinton's guilt, and yet you make up false garbage about Trump, despite far more evidence against Clinton, Weinstein, Hillary Clinton, and others in the Democrat party. .

And Epstein's relationships with Bill Gates and many other wealthy Democrat elites. Period, the end.
The evidence agains Democrats is overwhelming. There is no evidence against Trump, just a fake Democrat narrative, to distract from Democrat guilt and close ties with Jeffrey Epstein, long after Epstein's first trial and conviction.


Originally Posted by M E M
...and convicted fraudster Trump..

More lol lol
What horse-shit !!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictments_against_Donald_Trump

It's already well established that in the cases against Trump, the Biden DOJ judge-shopped for partisan Democrat judges in all 4 cases, and with extreme bias, selected districts/venues that were all over 90% rabid foaming at-the-mouth Trump-hating Democrat jury districts. Some of whom openly gloated on CNN about licking their lips at the opportunity to convict Trump on ANY charges, to help the Democrat-Bolshevik party against Trump in 2024, no matter what the evidence. FACT.

Three of the four cases against Trump completely collapsed.
And the last was also the product of a biased judge and a biased jury, with manipulation of the law to even bring charges against Trump.

1) In the Stormy Daniels "legal fees" written on the check, it was in fact a check written by Trump to lawyer Michael Cohen , reimbursing him for "legal fees". EXACTLY what it says on the check, no crime. But EVEN IF Trump had done something wrong (which he didn't) the fine for mislabeling a business check is like $200, and the statue of limitations ran out years ago.
So Letitia James (working illegally with Biden's DOJ lawyers) concocted a way to re-file this expired possible misdemeanor, and turned it into 32 FEDERAL charges with made-up new federal felony charges.

and

2) In the alleged E. Jean Carroll "rape" case, she cannot remember the exact place, the date, or even the YEAR of the alleged incident. THERE ARE NO FACTS, NONE !!
Ultimately Trump was found innocent of rape. But the biased jury found him guilty of a lesser charge of "sexual abuse" with a huge fine of an astronomical $83.3 million.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Je..._defamation_lawsuit_against_Donald_Trump

And then when Trump protested that the trial and verdict was a sham and he was not guilty of anything, in a biased case, with a biased judge and biased jury, Trump was further fined over $800 million for alleged "defamation" of E. Jean Carroll.
And that's all IN ADDITION to Trump's legal fees collectively for all four cases.

Where is there ANY precedent, for ANY of this?
NO ONE has ever been charged for the crimes Trump was indiced for, nor have there EVER been damages in these amounts, particularly for such specious allegations and total lack of evidence.
Hate of Trump, that's all that motivates these prosecutions or jury verdicts. Certainly not evidence or precedent.

Both Alan Dershowiz and Jonathan Turley, the two most acclaimed legal scholars in the country, have said BOTH these cases will ultimately be overturned on appeal, when they go to a higher court for their egregious biases and abuses of the legal system. Dershowitz sat in he courtroom of the Merchan case, and said he has never seen such overt bias on the part of a judge. Literally every prosecuttion objection was sustaained, literally every objection by Trump's defense team was over-ruled.



So.. there is no actual " conviction" or "fraud" on Trump's part. It's all Democrat-Bolshevik abuse of the legal system, and propaganda from the Democrat-Bolshevik party, working hand-in-glove with the Democrat-Bolshevik news media.
And if Democrats were capable of shame, they would be terrified and deeply embarassed by their party's vast abuse of legal and federal power, to go after Trump on fake charges, in an authoritarian grab for power.

But as we all know by now, Democrats are utterly incapable of conscience or shame.