.FBI's Patel clarifies role of hundreds of agents on Jan 6
This was an important admission as Trump was saying they were there before the riot started. The truth was that they were called only after the riot started. One of many Trump lies dispelled by one of his most loyal toadies.
I JUST EXPLAINED why that is a bogus narrative. The facts don't conform to your shit false narrative. There is NO WAY that 274 agents could be called, show up, and organize in LESS than 3 and a half hours that the "riots" (and even that term overstates what actually happened on Jan 6th) occurred, from approximately 12:40 PM till 4:10 PM. And there was probably not enough of a situation to call for reinforcements, if they actually did call the 274 agents in spontaneously after-the-fact, until sometime after 2:15 PM, when the first protesters breached the Capitol interior.
So at best, your narrative assumes that 274 agents were all called and arrived and organized in LESS THAN 2 hours.
That's just simply not believable.
Added to that, the Capitol police say they had no idea these 274 agents were there, and certainly did NOT assist Capitol police, as your shit narrative alleges, in containing rioting protesters.
ANYONE can make a public statement, and it is not necessarily true, and in this case it is OBVIOUSLY factually untrue, no matter who made the public statement. I happen to like Kash Patel and like that he is the current FBI director. And I don't know his reasons for the untrue statement he made. AGAIN, I think it has to do with the fact that he is running an FBI that is 97% Democrat, and an FBI that is resisting Kash Patel's every effort to clear away at least 20 years of FBI corruption and Democrat weaponization, and restore public trust in the FBI. And to do so with that much resistance, Kash Patel has to choose his battles, and in this case made a statement that allowed those under him to save face.
…
The 97 percent stat is another lie. And it wouldn’t be surprising that the Capitol police wasn’t aware of agents trying to get there after the riot started. They were clearly overwhelmed with all the “peaceful Trump supporters” trying to beat the shit out of them. It was a pretty chaotic scene. I absolutely don’t believe Kash Patel would lie about something that contradicted Trump. Especially a conspiracy theory so beloved by maga. Patel is way too loyal to Trump. This is something that shouldn’t be a mystery either. Phone records would show when these agents were called. And considering that Trump is accusing these agents of being part of a false flag operation it’s unacceptable to just let that hang. If there really was evidence of this, his DOJ would be going after those agents harder than the poor saps who touched the peeling liner of the reflecting pool.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...olitical-donations-went-hillary-clinton/ FACT.
That I've sourced and linked about a thousand times here, over the last 6 years or so.
Further confirmed by the actions and texts of James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Srzok, Lisa Page, James Baker, Kevin Clinesmith, Christopher Wray, and several dozen others at the highest level of the FBI (and if you weren't aware, FBI is a subdivision, within the DOJ ).
The FBI's stated reason those 274 "plainclothes" FBI agents were sent on Jan 6th to the Capitol was SPECIFICALLY to assist Capitol police.
If they were actually assisting Capitol police, SOMEONE in the Capitol police force would have known they were there on Jan 6th. That Capitol police did not, clearly puts the lie to the FBI's false talking points narrative for why they were there.
The ACTUAL reason they were there was to disguise themselves as Trump supporters, frame Trump supporters for false-flag FBI's own agitation and crimes, and try to incite the peaceful crowd to violence, which Trump's supporters overwhelmingly did NOT do.
There are over 20 Jan 6th rioters not identified. With FBI's face-recognition technology, and FBI's ability to identify even a masked person by their walk (or "gait"), how FBI identified every Trump supporter real estate agent and grandma to arrest at gunpoint in armed FBI raids and prosecute, there is only ONE reason these 20 or so were never identified by FBI: Because
they are FBI agents, and it would be an embarassment for FBI, to identify who these agents are, and have them plea bargain the reasons for their being there on Jan 6th, in a prosecution, if arrested.
FBI officials Christopher Wray and Jill Sanborn when asked if there were FBI agents undercover disguised as Trump supporters OVER AND OVER were asked 1) Were there undercover agents in the crowd, 2) Did these undercover FBI agents incite violence in the crowd, and 3 ) Did these undercover false-flag FBI agents commit violence and vandalism THEMSELVES on Jan 6th?
And each time, Christopher Wray and assistant FBI director Jill Sanborn said
"Senator I can't answer that.." Because if they said "yes" they would be admitting FBI's conspiracy to frame Trump and his supporters, to setting them up.
And if they said "no" and it was proven later that there were, oh, say,
274 false flag FBI agents found to be in the crowd on Jan 6, that PROVED otherwise, they would be going to jail for perjury.
And as much as you obviously hate Kash Patel, WHY do you believe he wouldn't lie to protect the FBI? The last
three FBI directors ( Robert Mueller, James Comey , and Christopher Wray ) have all lied, engaged in conspiracies against Trump and other Republicans (at least back o Ted Stevens and Scooter Libby) , and then further lied to protect themselves and the FBI from accountability.
I see Kash Patel as arguably not lying, just evasively engaging in spin to protect the FBI's reputation, as his predecessors have. In Patel's case, in an effort to get some internal cooperation in reforming the FBI to some degree.
The phone records thing cuts both ways. I think if the phone records actually proved what you say, the FBI would have produced those records a long time ago, to vindicate themselves.
Judicial Watch sued for the police bodycam video, about 1,000 hours of video (which they now have up on their website) , and Capitol police and FBI wanted to blur the video before releasing it, and Judicial Watch sued to get clear and visible footage (not blurred for "security reasons") and Judicial Watch with a judge's order, WON.
At every stage for the last 5 years, Democrats want to hide what actually happened, whereas Republicans want to release all the video footage and evidence.
What does THAT tell you, about who has nothing to hide, and who wants to tell the public the truth?
