So an assassin killed one law maker and her husband and almost succeeded in killing another and their spouse in Minnesota and when confronted with his religious and conservative background you go to a poll you like.
Asked and answered.
A poll of Democrats shows 55% agree with killing Trump.
And 48% in the same poll think it would be right to kill Elon Musk. The link is right above.
And YOU don't condemn this, you just obfuscate and change the subject, and go on rationalizing the murder of Charlie Kirk as him somehow "causing his own death."
We've been over this before.
The shooter in the creepy mask is a rabid Democrat, and says he shot the lawmaker and her husband on orders from Governor Tim Walz.
"Minnesota lawmaker and husband assassinated" topic
https://www.rkmbs.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1240705 I also didn't make any cruel jokes about the murders, I only quoted Senator Mike Lee, who posted on social media about the murders, and then [ Mike Lee] out of sensitivity deleted his post.
Even if that last part about Walz sending him to kill them is untrue and only in the shooter's head, the shooter is still a fanatical Democrat ideologue, who was motivated to shoot Democrat leaders because they were voting in dissent from Walz and other Minnesota Democrats.
Even though he was Democrat, he killed them because (in his mind) they weren't Democrat enough. And it is a further example of those in your party's need to resort to intimidation and violence when things don't go their way politically, or just run across someone who is wearing a MAGA hat, or just doesn't agree with them. (See the THOUSANDS of examples I linked above.)
I fail to see how that connects to your slanders of Trump, and your CLEARLY IN YOUR OWN WORDS blaming Charlie Kirk for his own death, saying he "brought about his own death" , with no sympathy or condemnation of Kirk's being shot by the lunatics in your own party, and the thousands of others gleefully celebrating Charlie Kirk's death on social media with such incredible cruelty.
There's just no getting around that .
The SHOOTER HIMSELF says that he was shooting Democrats who were's Democrat enough, ones who dissented from supporting legislation Tim Walz advocated.
So he's a far-Left Democrat lunatic, who was shooting other Democrat legislators he perceived to not be far-Left enough.
What exactly is it about plainly written English detailing these facts from quoted news sources, that you don't understand?
Just yesterday Trump lied and blamed Walz for cyber attacks that hit multiple states and that his own officials believe were likely conducted by Iran.
I frankly disagree with Trump on this point. But it is not proven that Trump is wrong.
After that I watched a clip of Jim Jordan being proud to campaign for a man that allegedly threw hot scalding water on his wife and abused his daughter enough to break her collar bone. I tuned out like most days after reaching my disgust quota that Trump and friends deliver daily.
I don't know who or what that is reference to.
I assume this one I Googled:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...allegedly-abusive-republican/ar-AA299em5But emphasis on the word "allegedly", not something proven.
In the article, Rep. Jim Jordan supports Miller's re-elecion. But Senator Bernie Moreno (Miller's father-in-law, faher of his wife) vocally opposes Miller's re-election. It's presented in the re-posted gay advocate article (clearly partisan-left, choosing sides with the Democrats) as if it was a straight apples-to=apples comparison.
But it is not.
There is one allegation against Miller, it could be a he said/she said, and I even saw Miller interviewed on Newsmax about it, andinerview before Miller of Bernie Moreno in the same story. Miller's estranged wife is Moreno's daughter. Miller explained she is bipolar and not accurate in the allegation. It's one incident, and he said / she said. Whereas Graham Platner has a whole boatload of allegations, from multiple accusers.
Frankly, I wouldn't endorse or vote for Miller, and I wouldn' voe for him, it's too questionable. But Jim Jordan has worked with him in the House, knows him personally and they talk frequently, I haven't. So Jim Jordan seems to know him and have assessed Miller as telling the truth and judged him no capable of that, not just endorsed him out of a bid for Republican House control. Miller also alleged in the interview that Senator Moreno offered him a large sum of money, 6 or 7 figures,t o quietly divorce his daughter without publicly discussing the break-up events and her alleged history of violent bipolar behavior. But if that's true, that certainly was not a transaction accepted, and the whole ugly mess has been made public, by both sides.
And you turn a blind eye to many such things in your own party, such as things said and endorsement by a large number of Democrats, of killing Jews in the Oct 7th Hamas attacks, by both Mamdani and his wife, his wife giving "thumbs up" on Facebook to the slaughter, murder and rape of 1,200 Jews.
Likewise Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Hasan Piker, and this Al Sayed guy running in primaries this week. That the Bolsheviks in your insane party all endorsed.
https://townhall.com/columnists/tay...l-cast-of-candidates-in-history-n2681134Likewise this Graham Platner guy in Maine running for Democrat Senator. Aside from having a Nazi SS tattoo ( same as the guards at Auschwitz, and Platner basks in his historical knowledge of the Nazis and clearly knew exactly what his tattoo means, and boasted abou it for 20 years), he also roughed up a girlfriend and trapped her in a room for an entire night, essentially kidnapping her. And also trolled for under-age girls on an under-age dating website. And cheated regularly on his newlywed wife of less than 3 years.
And raped another girl, this las one he death blow to his Senate run.
Plus lunatic stuff about masturbating in port-a-potty bathrooms.
And Platner fantasizes to others about catching a man burglarizing his house, so he can rape and humiliate him. Oh, but not because he's homosexual!! No SIR !!
Every Democrat endorsed this Platner guy until the last girl made her rape allegation. And at that point other Democrat leaders ONLY stopped supporting him because from then on he was losing in the polls, so even then, they ONLY stopped supporting him because he couldn't win.
And this race-obsessed Francesca Hong communist running for governor of Wisconsin, and her long list of Marxist and America-hating comments.
And likewise a total of 37 similar America-hating Marxist and/or Islamic jihadist advocating candidates.
The ONLY reason Democrats don't endorse the worst of the worst in their party is if they aren't winning in the polls. Otherwise, there is NOTHING, no shameful past event, that Democrats will not support. and that is proven over and over again.
Going back to at least 2016, with Debbie Wasserman BITCH-CUNT Schulttz exposed by Wikileaks, forcing her to resign as DNC chair.
Plus Hillary Clinton, insider trader Nancy Pelosi, "well we won, didn't we?" Harry Reid.
Along with new DNC chair Donna Brazil who helped give Hillary Clinton CNN's primary debate questions in advance, and also helped rig rig the DNC primary elections for Hillary Clinton, and against Bernie Sanders.
All with heavy ties to Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein, both of whom Democrats still took campaign money from, and were best pals with, long after these two were each indicted and national news , for their decades-long systemic abuse of women.
Democrat-Bolsheviks one and all. No ethics, no shame.
