Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 18 of 18 1 2 … 16 17 18
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
Attkisson basically makes money doing reporting that won’t offend her maga audience. Her reporting when she was winning those awards is vastly different these days. The critical stories she once had for presidential administrations don’t seem to interest her when Trump is in office. I watched a piece she did on Jan 6 about over prosecuting but don’t see anything close to similar to Trump’s ICE reign of terror for example.


That's total B.S.

Attkisson was a reporter for half of her career for CNN. Was she "writing for a MAGA audience" then ?!?

Then she was an investigative reporter for CBS News the second half of her career.

She was a liberal reporter for 40 years... she spent 8 years doing award-winning investigative reporting of the W.Bush administration, that often embarrassed Bush... and THEN she magically, after 40 years, began pandering to a MAGA audience?!?
Does that make any sense?

Is she imployed by Fox News ? No.
Is she employed by Newsmax? No.
Is she employed by any other "right wing" publication or network? No.

But ACCORDING TO YOU, this self-described liberal reporter is suddenly a MAGA reporter, propagandizing a right wing talking points agenda. Despite that you can provide ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE to back that up.
Sharyl Attkisson has appeared maybe a dozen times that I can recall on Fox News in 12 years, since she broke her contract and left CBS. Mostly to explain why she left CBS, to describe the FBI / CIA level of hacking to her computer, used to spy on her and to remotely access her computer and partially erase her stored work and research. And when she had tech investigators look at her computer, they basically said wow, this is really high-level stuff used on you, the kind of stuff that only FBI, CIA and defense agencies have access to.
And she also argued the cause of neutral/objective news reporting, and the need to return to that standard, even as the mainstream media does the opposite, goes hard-left / Democrat-Bolshevik without the slightest shame.

The only difference in Sharyl Attkisson's reporting is that... when she was doing investigative reporting on the W. Bush administration, and that was hurting Bush' popularity, CBS executives were loving it.
But when Attkisson began doing the EXACT SAME type of investigative reporting exposing and hurting Barack Obama's administration, CBS began heavily editing and blunting her news stories, or not airing them at all.
Till she finally, in frustration, broke her contract and quit CBS.

All she ever did was try to do good investigative work and hold both political parties to the same standard. But CBS executives, as part of the "new journalism", want one-sided propaganda that props up Democrats and only attacks Republicans. And kills any stories that hurt the Democrats.

If Sharyl Attkisson is such a MAGA propagandist, why does she not have a high-paying position for Fox News, Newsmax, or some other overtly right-leaning publication?
Your argument has no facts to support it.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,246
Likes: 59
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,246
Likes: 59
You could just say you don't understand the modern media landscape rather than aggressively asserting you're a stupid douche.

1 member likes this: Matter-eater Man
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 112
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 112
I think WB understands to be honest. He just wants favorable reporting for his corrupt president. Sheryl gears her stuff for people like him. It’s pretty evident from her output that there isn’t going to be any tough reporting on Trump or his administration. It just isn’t tolerated by maga and she seems to be content collecting the paychecks.


Fair play!
1 member likes this: iggy
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,246
Likes: 59
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,246
Likes: 59
Even better, I did the digging and she's on that bastion of liberalism and fair news coverage Sinclair Broadcasting's payroll...

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by iggy
You could just say you don't understand the modern media landscape rather than aggressively asserting you're a stupid douche.

Pure insults, no facts.

As opposed to the sourced facts I posted. You stupid douche.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
I think WB understands to be honest. He just wants favorable reporting for his corrupt president. Sheryl gears her stuff for people like him. It’s pretty evident from her output that there isn’t going to be any tough reporting on Trump or his administration. It just isn’t tolerated by maga and she seems to be content collecting the paychecks.


She spent the majority of her over 4 decades at ultra-liberal CNN and CBS.
She is an award-winning journalist, one of the most acclaimed journalists of the last 4 decades.

And you can present, NO EVIDENCE, ZERO, NONE, that she is somehow a "right wing" journalist who panders to conservatives, despite that she works for none of the conservative networks.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,246
Likes: 59
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,246
Likes: 59
Glossing over the fact she works for Sinclair is really embracing that stupid douche choice, asshat.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 112
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 112
Thank you gop for having Jack Smith on capital hill right before the election, lol.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
I think WB understands to be honest. He just wants favorable reporting for his corrupt president. Sheryl gears her stuff for people like him. It’s pretty evident from her output that there isn’t going to be any tough reporting on Trump or his administration. It just isn’t tolerated by maga and she seems to be content collecting the paychecks.

Originally Posted by iggy
Glossing over the fact she works for Sinclair is really embracing that stupid douche choice, asshat.



A summary of Sharyl Attkisson's 45-plus-year career in journalism, noting her many awards for journalism excellence and objective journalism standards, applied whether she was reporting on Republican or Democrat administrations. That for decades was mostly investigating and embarassing Republican administrations, and that she only was censored by CBS when she applied the same investigative journalism standards to the Obama administration, that CBS suddenly began editing, blunting and/or not airing her stories.

Her record:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharyl_Attkisson


Quote
CAREER

Attkisson began her career in broadcast journalism as a reporter at WUFT-TV, the PBS station in Gainesville, Florida, in 1982.
She later worked as an anchor and reporter at WTVX-TV in Fort Pierce/West Palm Beach from 1982 to 1985, at WBNS-TV, the CBS affiliate in Columbus, Ohio, from 1985 to 1986, and at WTVT in Tampa, from 1986 to 1990.[17]

From 1990 to 1993, Attkisson was an anchor for CNN, and served as a key anchor for CBS covering space exploration in 1993.[18] Attkisson left CNN in 1993,[19] moving to CBS, where she anchored the television news broadcast CBS News Up to the Minute until January 1995, then became an investigative correspondent based in Washington, D.C.[17][20]

She served on the University of Florida's Journalism College Advisory Board (1993–1997) and was its chair in 1996.[17] The university gave her an Outstanding Achievement Award in 1997. From 1996 to 2001, Attkisson hosted the PBS health-news magazine HealthWeek.[17]

Attkisson received an Investigative Reporters and Editors (I.R.E.) Finalist award for Dangerous Drugs in 2000.[21] In 2001, Attkisson received an Investigative Emmy Award nomination for Firestone Tire Fiasco from the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.[22]

In 2002, she co-authored the college textbook Writing Right for Broadcast and Internet News. Later that same year she won an Emmy Award for her investigative journalism about the American Red Cross.[17][23] Attkisson was part of the CBS News team that received the RTNDA-Edward R. Murrow Awards in 2005 for Overall Excellence.[21]

In 2006, Attkisson served as Capitol Hill correspondent for CBS,[24] one of a small number of female anchors covering the 2006 midterms.[25] Attkisson was a member of the CBS News team that received RTNDA-Edward R. Murrow Awards in 2008 for Overall Excellence.[21]

In 2008, when Hillary Clinton said she dodged sniper fire in Bosnia, Attkisson, who was on the trip, refuted Clinton's account, saying the trip to Bosnia was risky but that there were no bullets to dodge. The Washington Post also expressed skepticism and reported that there were no 'documented security threats' included in a review of 100 news articles from the time.[26]
The day after Attkisson's report on the CBS Evening News, Clinton admitted there was no sniper fire and said she "misspoke".[27][28]

In 2009, Attkisson won an Investigative Emmy Award for Business and Financial Reporting for her exclusive reports on the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the bank bailout.[21]

In 2010, Attkisson was nominated for two Emmy Awards for investigations into members of Congress and waste of tax dollars.[29]
In July 2011, Attkisson was again nominated, for Follow the Money investigations into Congressional travel to the Copenhagen climate summit, and problems with aid to Haiti earthquake victims.[21][30]

In 2012, Attkisson received an award reporting on ATF's Fast and Furious gunwalker controversy from Accuracy in Media, a conservative news media watchdog group.[31]
In June 2012, Attkisson's investigative reporting for the gunwalker story also won the CBS Evening News the Radio and Television News Directors Association's National Edward R. Murrow Award for Excellence in Video Investigative Reporting.[32]
In July 2012, Attkisson's Gunwalker: Fast and Furious reporting received an Emmy Award.[33]

The following year, Exposing the Business of Congress, which examined the impact of lobbyists on the United States Congress, was awarded an Emmy for investigative journalism in a newscast,[34] while her work on Green Energy Going Red and Libya: Dying for Security led to nominations.[35]
Exposing the Business of Congress was also nominated for a 2013 Gerald Loeb Award in the broadcast category.[36]

On March 10, 2014, Attkisson resigned from CBS News in what she stated was an "amicable" parting.[37][38]
Politico reported that according to sources within CBS there had been tensions leading to "months of hard-fought negotiations" – that Attkisson had been frustrated over what she perceived to be the network's liberal bias and lack of dedication to investigative reporting, as well as issues she had with the network's corporate partners, while some colleagues within the network saw her reporting as agenda-driven and doubted her impartiality.[38]
Erik Wemple, in his Washington Post blog, said CBS News had greater resources to deal with potential litigation than Attkisson as an individual and commented "if her nearly aired stories are as bulletproof as she suggests, where’s the risk?"[39] He quoted Sonya McNair, a spokesman for CBS News, who had told him the operation "maintains the highest journalistic standards in what it chooses to put on the air. Those standards are applied without fear or favor."[39]

Attkisson's book Stonewalled: One Reporter's Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama's Washington was published by Harper later in 2014 and became a New York Times best seller.[40]

Her second book, The Smear: How Shady Political Operatives and Fake News Control What You See, What You Think, and How You Vote, was published by HarperCollins in summer 2017.[41] It also became a New York Times best seller.[42]

In 2017, Attkisson created a media bias chart that was reused by right-wing blog PJ Media[43] and characterized as "a bastardization" of that produced by Ad Fontes Media.[44] According to PolitiFact, this chart "labels anything not overtly conservative as 'left'". The news outlets with a purported left bias include the Associated Press, Reuters, the American television networks ABC, NBC/CNBC, and CBS, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, NPR, Politico, and USA Today.[45] BuzzFeed News reported in August 2018 that Attkisson indicated on her website that she compiled the "subjective" chart "from various sources and your feedback".[46] She linked "various sources" to a study from the Pew Research Center, a Washington think tank that BuzzFeed said "measures audience bias, not the alleged bias of an outlet and a college library's website that cites another college library's project describing media outlets." Attkisson's chart includes such websites as InfoWars (to which Attkisson is reported to link from her own site).[46]

Her book Slanted: How the News Media Taught us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism was published in November 2020.[47]


Wow.

According to Left-leaning Wikipedia, who would certainly cite such a bias with all the venom they could summon, Sharyl Attkisson's right-wing bias is SO PREVALENT and SO OVERWHELMING that....
Wikipedia makes no mention of it.
Nothing.
But she certainly has decades of the highest journalistic credentials and awards.


Also, her conservative bias and connection to Sinclair is SO PREVALENT THAT... again, nothing mentioned.


And by the way, I'm a well documented conservative here on RKMB since 2001, who prides myself to be on the pulse of all things conservative since at least 1980, and till now I've never even heard of Sinclair media.
And again, no mention of Sinclair in relation to Sharyl Attkisson by ultra-Left Wikipedia, who would triple-orgasm and hyperventilate over such a connection.








Regarding Sinclair Broadcast Group...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group


... I don't feel like reading all that right now, but despite owning a couple hundred local channels and syndicated series, and other broadcast or internet streaming ventures, many of which I've watched not even knowing their connection to Sinclair, such as the channel Comet (sci-fi and detective shows, like Criminal Minds, X-Files and the 1990's version of The Outer Limits), channel ROAR (that airs comedy shows and Saturday Night Live re-runs) or the syndicated daily show National News Desk, I never would have guessed to watch them that they are owned by a conservative broadcast company, and detected no conservative message in their programming.

The few overtly conservative programs they require (i.e., "Must run segments"), I would consider just something resembling equal time, a tiny drop of conservatism, in an ocean of liberal bias, as the Left tries to snuff out all dissenting conservative political thought by not airing them, that even when Sinclair mandates local (liberal) stations air them, STILL don't come anywhere close to conservative equal time, just the barest bones of conservative representation in the national political dialogue by airing them.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 112
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 112
So bias is ok if it benefits your party. We already knew you would be ok with conservatives forcing bias but hopefully you understand what a joke Atkinson is going on about bias while Sinclair forces pro Trump opinion pieces on local stations. It’s not a principled stand.


Fair play!
1 member likes this: iggy
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
So bias is ok if it benefits your party. We already knew you would be ok with conservatives forcing bias but hopefully you understand what a joke Atkinson is going on about bias while Sinclair forces pro Trump opinion pieces on local stations. It’s not a principled stand.

I don't know what kind of crack you're smoking, to get from my extensive post (from ultra-liberal/Left Wikipedia, whose own co-founder says has denigrated to a Left wing propaganda source, and yet they STILL acknowledge Atttkisson's impeccable credentials) of Sharyl Atkisson's impressive list 45 years of award-winning journalism awards, year after year for decades, some years from both conservative and mainstream liberal journalism groups awarding her their highest honors for investigative journalism excellence the same year.



And then my citing of Wikipedia's (again, very liberal / Left source) list of Sinclair Broadcast Group's history and programming, that likewise shows barely a hint of conservative programming, but they require their stations to broadcast ONE weekly 30-minute program that is conservative, requires these affiliate stations to give this SLIGHTEST representation of conservative opinion, not even coming close to 50% conservative perspective, NOT EVEN 2% conservative perspective. And THAT for you, is too much, THAT for you is "conservatives forcing bias".

Your "Democrat-Socialist" Bolshevism is showing, M E M.
ANY conservative representation in your Stalinist world, is "forcing bias".

But 24 / 7 saturation across virtually all the news networks and newspapers of
92% liberal bias against Trump, and against any other Republican, for you is... perfectly fair.

I think maybe you would be much more comfortable living in Xi Xinping's communist China, Vladimir Putin's Russia, Castro's Cuba, Pol Pot's Cambodia, The Sandinistas' Nicaragua, or Hugo Chaves and Meduro's Vanezuela.
These are clearly your kind of guys.
You clearly don't believe in the Constitution or the First Amendment, just in an authoritarian system that allows your own party's lying propaganda, and snuffs out all other dissent.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,246
Likes: 59
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Society's Discontent
6000+ posts
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,246
Likes: 59
Pot really giving kettle quite the talking to. rolleyes

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by iggy
Pot really giving kettle quite the talking to. rolleyes

Your comment says absolutely nothing, dipshit.

Whereas I cited sources and a long list of Sharyl Attkisson's highly awarded invesigative journalism credentials over 45 years, that EVEN PARTISAN-LEFT WIKIPEDIA acknowledges.
With absolutely no proof that Sharyl Attkisson is a "right wing" reporter, as you two turds allege.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 112
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Fair Play!
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 112
WB I already acknowledged that she had a reputation a while back. You’re upset because I’m also pointing out that in the last decade plus she simply isn’t that anymore. She works for a company that forces biased programming. And there hasn’t been any reporting by her that resembles her old reporting when it comes to the Trump administration. Trump loves being interviewed by her because it’s a safe space.


Fair play!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
brutally Kamphausened
15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by Matter-eater Man
WB I already acknowledged that she had a reputation a while back. You’re upset because I’m also pointing out that in the last decade plus she simply isn’t that anymore. She works for a company that forces biased programming. And there hasn’t been any reporting by her that resembles her old reporting when it comes to the Trump administration. Trump loves being interviewed by her because it’s a safe space.


The extensive Wikipedia link I posted ( from a partisan LIBERAL source, that STILL acknowledges her winning DECADES of the highest honors for investigative journalism, FOR DECADES, from conservative and liberal news organizations, on several occasions from both sides in the same years), PROVE the lie of what you're trying to allege.
She has been, and remains, a highly respected journalist. Likewise John Stossel, Glenn Greenwald, Lara Logan, John Solomon, Michael Schellenberger, and a number of other award-winning, and even Pulitzer-winning journalists, who you slander without facts as "partisan".

She relentlessly criticizes the mainstream media, with HUNDREDS of cited and sourced examples as abandoning journalism standards, that have become since about 2000, and increasingly since 2008, "new journalism" that is one-sided Democrat propaganda, who think it is their holy mission to prop up Democrats and help them win elections, and crush Republicans, rather than just report the facts and practice objective journalism that holds both sides to the same standard.

Page 18 of 18 1 2 … 16 17 18

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0