RKMBs Forums .::Important::. Politics and Current Events MoU Text

.


If I said Trump blaming Walz for the cyber-attacks in Minnesota is something I disagree with, but is not factually proven to be incorrect, how is that not disagreeing with Trump on that point?
How is that being forbidden to disagree with Trump? I just did.

Similarly, a few years ago, I said it was not proven that Trump had a sexual relationship with Stormy Daniels. That Trump said it did not happen, but I said that if Trump is like most men, he probably did, but cannot be proven that Trump and Stormy Daniels had a sexual relationship.
Several years later, I see it differently, that Trump is a wealthy guy, and like many wealthy men, he is surrounded with beautiful women who offer themselves to wealthy men, and then if the offer is taken by the man, will gouge the man legally and financially, if he takes the bait. So in retrospect, I now think Trump did NOT sleep with Stormy Daniels, that despite her being a nice piece of ass, he saw having any involvement with her as a legal risk, and so didn't take her offer, and ceased contact. And her story has changed multiple times in the 20 years since, to find a narrative that has allowed her to profit from the false allegation, every way she could.

In the case of Vince Foster turning up dead in a park during Bill Clinton's presidency, the official conclusion is it was a "suicide", but I believe based on evidence and facts that don't follow the official narrative, that Foster was murdered and the Clintons had him killed. That at the very time police discovered his body, the Clintons were taking compromising never-revealed boxes of legal files out of Foster's office. How did they know Foster would not be coming back, that the Clintons could take them, at the precise time his body was found? Or that there was very little blood where his body was found, indicating Foster was killed elsewhere and then moved to the park. And inconsistent position of the gun and his head wound. And oher clues, and lack of fingerprints on the gun, and on Foser's car keys.
https://uspresscorps370.substack.com/p/the-death-of-vince-foster-the-case



In each of these examples, I was clear what the facts are, and divergently, what I believe despite the official narrative, and the facts or circumstantial evidence that makes me believe otherwise. That makes me an independent thinker in each case, not propping up a narrative, or part of a "cult" that feels it necessary to accept only one narrative.

.

This Youube documentary on the years of Jimmy Carter's presidency...


Jimmy Carter: The President Who BROKE America




... reminded me of how disastrous and nation-destroying not just Carter's presidency was ( that Ronald Reagan presidency cleaned up and revitalized) but also how that same Democrat pattern recurred under Bill Clinton, and then Barack Obama, and then Joe Biden.


The pattern is always the same :

1) Democrats PRETEND TO CARE about the middle class, "Ohh, we're like you" say the pod people

2) Once elected, shove aside all concern for Americans, middle class or otherwise, and pursue their true America-hating / America-blaming socialist / Marxist ideology :
Raise taxes on everyone ( not just "the rich" ) ,
Diminish and financially gut U.S. national security to pay for social programs.
Then Democrats intentionally and deliberately pursue ideological policy, in total opposition to reality, that implodes the economy, spikes crime and illegal immigration, increases poverty and welfare dependency, in an effort to make a majority dependent on government assistance, so that a majority of voters will consistently vote for the Democrat-Bolshevik party that provides those benefits. And once achieved, once Democrats have a permanent majority, for anyone who dissents, the James Comeys and Peter Strzoks can just weaponize against dissenters, cut off their assistance, and/or prosecute and imprison them. Or following the digital currency models in China and Canada, cut off dissenting citizens' access to their own bank accounts, no matter how wealthy.

And as Democrats currently plan, to slash away Constitutional checks and balances so once in power, a small Democrat-Bolshevik core can no longer be voted out of office, so the people (as they did in 1980, 1984, 2000, 2004, 2016 and 2024) will no longer be able to remove a Democrat-Socialist Maxist government they find oppressive, as they have in the past.

Which really is no surprise, because Democrats openly worship people like Lenin, Marx, Stalin, Castro, Communist China, the Sandinistas, and Hugo Chaves, and have openly quoted them while in office since 2008. I've quoted and posted video-clips of them saying it here for years.
It is no coincidence that Democrats worship Marxist authoritarian federal control, and then want to do exactly that when they achieve power.
Democrats portray Trump and other Republicans as the "existential threat to Democracy", but THEY ARE the existential threat, who want to shred the Constitution and chip away all checks and balances, so they can stay in power unopposed forever.


Regarding presidenial elections, Ann Coulter in 2008 said:
Every few years American voters decide to give the Democrats a chance, and are so horrified with the result that it scares them into voting Republican again.

But the Democrats are now trying to create a system where they can no longer be voted out of power. To rig the system.
And that is as Bolshevik and "existential threat" as it gets.

No one is either a) reading that or b) taking it seriously if they do.

Because you're a deeply indoctrinated piece of shit troll, with no interest in what Democrats are actually doing to implode the country.
What they OPENLY SAY they plan to do.
And what other Democrats PRETEND they didn't say, so they can get elected and have a chance to actually do it.

What they did under Jimmy Carter from 1977-1981.
Wha they did under Bill Clinton from 1993-2001
What they did under Barack Obama from 2009-2017.
What thy did under Joe Biden from 2021-Jan 2025.

A consisent nation-destroying Democrat-Bolshevik pattern.

FACT.

The bullshit governance under this administration is rallying people to socialism in response. Accept that you're part of the problem.

And I would add that democrats failed during Biden’s term to be able to do enough to turn things around so that the average American was feeling the relief. Trump’s promise of a quick golden age worked in 2024 but now it’s obvious that didn’t happen. What happened was the very wealthy got even more wealthy as the majority face higher costs and pay that hasn’t kept up with inflation. That has been going on for decades no matter the party. There is need for major reforms and actual relief for those that are not wealthy.

MEM, "the Bolshevik Communist," gets it.

hot damn. I sure changed over the years but this place feels like a fucking time capsule.

Whoa! Sammitch sighting! Good to see ya.

what it dooooooooo


I wanted to change my screen name, considering how little I still have in common with that guy, but I wanted to show SOME respect to the history of this place. that and this place can be confusing enough as it is.

Yeah?

I hear you. Not exactly the same Iggy from 20 years ago either. But, Dave is tortuously still Dave.

Yeah, presenting cited and sourced inconvenient FACTS, you don't want to hear, and are immune to, in your brainwashed liberal bubble.

You believe that 5000 for every adult citizen is a rebate. Sit the fuck down, retard.

I believe I was very clear that I would prefer that money be used to pay down the cumulative debt. But yes, the checks would no be additional spending. The money Americans have already spent on Obamacare, and the revenue gained from tariffs and the $21 trillion (so far) invested in the U.S. for research, development, and factories that will grow the economy, mean that Trump's plan o send out checks, unlike the checks of W. Bush, Obama and Biden, are essentially paying for themselves, offset by growth.



And by the way, you had NO OBJECTION for over 15 years here, to these past presidents over the last 20 years sending out checks that were NOT paid for.
So you're both a hypocrite, AND a retard.

Why are you so immune to logic and facts?

Trump's policies are building a United States with a clear vision for the future, where the U.S. is on the path to be the economic and technological world leader for the next century, with both new factories and jobs creating new tax revenue to pay down the debt over the coming decades.

With all the brightest and the best nations and corporations investing that $ 21 trillion in the U.S., to build and share in that future prosperity.
Whereas with Hillary Clinton, or Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris, or the other Democrat-Bolsheviks, we would be surrendering our U.S. sovereignty to China and a nuclear-armed Iran, and be on the path to ruin.

hot damn, at least somebody here remains cognitively unchanged. which, I mean, top marks for consistency I guess?

Spending money that's not guaranteed like most of those investment dollars is pure idiocy that adds to the debt, Davetard.

Insults, because you have no facts. And 6th grade insults is all you've got.


Already asked and answered:

There has not been 21 trillion in investment from which to recoup these dollars, assbrain.

You still provide ZERO facts to support that allegation. Shithead.
These nations and corporations have publicly pledged that $21 trillion of investment to Trump to build those factories, AI tecnology, power plants and oher infrasructure.