|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
|
|
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40 |
Dave's hitting both new levels of Dunning Krueger and cognitive dissonance at the same time. You have to give him credit for that. Lather, rinse, repeat. I've made detailed, cited and sourced arguments, over and over, you have not done that at any point, so what is there for me to respond to? Dipshit.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
|
|
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112 |
WB repeating the same horseshit lies and deception over and over again doesn’t make them facts. Kash Patel by no means would lie about a staple Trump conspiracy. There’s tons of facts that disprove Trump’s lie about the 2020 election. And we all watched MAGA beat the shit out of law enforcement. Then your POs pardoned them and then attacked the law enforcement that took the beating.
Fair play!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
|
|
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40 |
You can keep on lying Dave but it’s a pretty pathetic lie. Kash Patel isn’t going to lie for a huge democratic conspiracy. And the conspiracy was too dumb to believe to begin with. The Democrat conspiracy is fully on display, and at the end of a five year series of FBI lies, NOT any lies from me. And that's piled on FBI lies regarding the weaponizing of FBI on a fake investigation after fake investigation of Donald Trump, since at least 2016. Kash Patel is not at all shy about detailing all those FBI conspiracies against Trump and the Republican House and Senate leadership. And fired 2,000 FBI agents for this malicious conspiracy. And I think he should have fired several thousand more, who are still eager to Democrat-weaponize the FBI again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossfire_Hurricane_(FBI_investigation) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Files https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia_investigation_origins_conspiracy_theory ...... ( Wikipedia still spins that one as "conspiracy theories", despite how much of it has absolutely been proven ) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_Frost_investigation FACT. You support the Democrat-Bolshevik party, that is NOTHING BUT lies. You support Black Lives Matter, Antifa, communists who openly are working with the Chinese and other globalists and communists to overthrow the United States, and their organized protests, a dress rehearsal for Marxist revolution, across hundreds of cities ( THAT YOU SUPPORT), that are OPENLY funded by these communist billionaires, foreign governments, and other dark money, TO DE-STABILIZE AND E AND OVERTHROW THE UNITED STATES. Your Democrat-Bolshevik party funds and supports these riots across hundreds of U.S. cities, funded by hundreds of millions of dollars in dark money. THAT is what you support. https://www.foxnews.com/world/whos-...l-activists#&_intcmp=fnhpbt1_3,hp1btAnd now your piece of shit Democrat-Bolshevik party now also supports Islamic terrorism, and their FURTHER rioting and burning cities in the United States as well. Adn the Democrat-Bolsheviks also ally themselves with ISLAMIC CANDIDATES who are deeply anti-American and likewise support the violent overthrow and destruction of the United States. Ilhan Omar. Rashida Tlaib. And now Muslim Brotherhood-connected Abdul Al-Sayad and a dozen other Democrat-Bolshevik radical Muslim-communist candidates. You try to portray me as telling "lies". Well, fuck you, M E M, your vicious Democrat-Bolshevik party is NOTHING BUT lies, and sides with every enemy who wants to destroy the United States, from without and from within.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
|
|
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112 |
We can agree that Kash has no problem making political motivated allegations that you believe in. That’s why it was a bit of a shock that he personally debunked Trump’s and yours lie about the 247 plainclothes agents. Kash is getting sued btw by agents he fired. I look forward to seeing what his investigation consisted of that resulted in their terminations. My guess is it’s going to be a clear case of political retribution because they were assigned to investigate Trump’s theft and mishandling of classified documents.
Fair play!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
|
|
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40 |
We can agree that Kash has no problem making political motivated allegations that you believe in. That’s why it was a bit of a shock that he personally debunked Trump’s and yours lie about the 247 plainclothes agents. Kash is getting sued btw by agents he fired. I look forward to seeing what his investigation consisted of that resulted in their terminations. My guess is it’s going to be a clear case of political retribution because they were assigned to investigate Trump’s theft and mishandling of classified documents. We can agree that Kash Patel as FBI director has made remarkable achievements in arresting most wanted criminals, opening mass investigations of unquestionable mass fraud, arresting domestic criminals and criminal illegals, and protecting the American people from harm. The murder rate is currently the lowest it has been in 125 years !!! Record arrests, targeting the true sources of crime, violence, domestic terrorism and fraud. Because Kash Patel's priorities are fighting crime and terrorism and arresting ACTUAL criminals and illegals, NOT devoting 40% of FBI's resources to fighting the fictional non-existent enemy of "domestic terrorism" by "white supremacists". Which was really just a way for a 97% Democrat-donating FBI to spy on, arrest and prosecute their conservative political opponents, by FALSELY LABELLING THEM as "domestic terrorists", to suppress and intimidate Democrats' political opposition. Likewise with the IRS destroying the Tea Party movement in 2010-2012, to rig the 2012 election for Barack Obama z(and probably still targeting conservatives). I disagree with Patel on the minor points I've cited, in not disclosing the full extent of FBI conspiracy on Jan 6th. And I've speculated his reasons, And no doubt, the Democrat-Bolsheviks still remaining in the FBI have out the long knives for Kash Patel. Patel fired 2,000 of FBI's 38,000 agents, and with the level of Democrat-Bolshevik infiltration of FBI, proven under Obama and Biden and even in Trump's first term to involve the entire management floor of the FBI, I have no doubt they will fight to keep the agency Democrat-weaponized. And the piece of shit agents who were fired no doubt have long chains of partisan texts along the lines of those found by Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Kevin Clinesmith, detailing their Democrat-Bolshevik malice toward the people they targeted, arrested, prosecuted, and extorted false confessions out of. ("Vive La Resistance", "Trump's not going become president, right? RIGHT?!?" "No. No he won't, we will stop it." ) Good luck challenging that. I would prefer prison time for these 2,000 fired, but at least they're out of the FBI. You portray rooting out corruption as "retribuion". Well fuck yes these agents deserved to be fired. And as I've said repeatedly, the level of cover up in FBI, undetected, manifests a vas majoriy of FBI agents participated in orchestrating o at leas enabling this abuse of power. For over 20 years in abusing their power against conservatives, against Catholics, against pro-life peaceful activists, against parents arrested for voicing objection to woke indoctrination at PTA meetings, with 6 AM FBI armed raids, FBI overcharging to force confessions. Spying on the entire Trump campaign and Trump administration. FBI raid on Mar A Lago. FBI orchestrating FOUR fake indictments of Trump, in the most rabidly pro-Democrat local districts in the U.S., with judge-shopped ultra-partisan Democrat judges, four rabid Democrat local prosecutors (led by he DOJ/FBI), and trials se up to be held in overwhelmingly Democrat jury venues, jurors licking their lips at the opportunity to convict Trump on ANY charge. Setting up Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, Senator Ted Stevens, Scooter Libby, Michael Caputo, Roger Stone, and even maliciously prosecuting the innocent ones in Enron, and Arthur Anderson executives, and Martha Stewart. ALL this FBI abuse of power has to be punished, and the ones who abused that power be purged from the FBI, AT THE VERY LEAST. That is not "retribution", that is justice. And 2,000 of these FBI agents fired is not nearly enough. And the ones still there are trying to destroy Kash Patel every day. And licking their lips at re-weaponizing the FBI, the instant a Democrat president is ever elected, and allows them to again do so. Fuck yes, fire them all.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
|
|
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112 |
Justice is delayed but it is coming WB. The indictments were real as well as Trump taking classified documents. He just ran out the clock. That won’t happen a second time.
Fair play!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
|
|
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112 |
Btw there wasn’t any prison time because that would have involved trials that would require evidence. Trump’s lies don’t do well in court.
Fair play!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
|
|
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40 |
Justice is delayed but it is coming WB. The indictments were real as well as Trump taking classified documents. He just ran out the clock. That won’t happen a second time. Two of the cases were tossed completely out of court. Of those prosecuted, Trump was prosecuted on made-up fake charges, charges so "novel" that NO ONE ELSE has EVER BEEN CHARGED with what Trump was tried for. Fake charges, judge-shopped ultra-partisan Democrat judges, partisan Democrat local county prosecutors, with illegal puppet-strings to Joe Biden and Merrick Garland's DOJ and FBI, illegally orchestrating the whole thing, with ultra-partisan over 90% Trump-hating juries in every case. . Jonathan Turley and Alan Dershowitz sat in these trials every day, and said they was the most disgustingly biased prosecutions they ever witnessed, in all their decades of trial law. And these are two guys who were lifelong Democrats. Both say that once these prosecutions reach the U S Supreme Court and get out of the ultra-Democrat partisan New York courts, the level of bias with which these trial were conducted will certainly get them overturned on appeal.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
|
|
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40 |
. Government workers shun Trump, give big money to Clintonhttps://thehill.com/homenews/campai...rump-give-big-money-to-clinton-campaign/- BY JONATHAN SWAN - 10/26/2016
Federal government employees are opening their wallets to help Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump on Nov. 8.
Of the roughly $2 million that federal workers from 14 agencies spent on presidential politics by the end of September, about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominee’s campaign, according to an analysis by The Hill.
Employees at all the agencies analyzed, without exception, are sending their campaign contributions overwhelmingly to Clinton over her Republican counterpart. Several agencies, such as the State Department, which Clinton once led, saw more than 99 percent of contributions going to Clinton.
Employees of the Department of Justice, which investigated Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of State, gave Clinton 97 percent of their donations. Trump received $8,756 from DOJ employees compared with $286,797 for Clinton. From IRS employees, Clinton received 94 percent of donations.
Federal government employees overwhelmingly backed Clinton’s presidential campaign no matter which agency The Hill analyzed using Federal Election Commission data covering donors giving more than $200.
Trump campaign spokesman Jason Miller said these donation patterns are more evidence of the “rigged system” favoring establishment candidates like Clinton over outsiders like Trump. The Trump campaign has been citing lopsided media donations to Clinton — though there’s no evidence they’re coming from reporters covering Trump — as further evidence that the game is fixed.
But David Schultz, a Hamline University Professor of Political Science, said government employees have historically favored Democratic candidates over Republicans both in their voting habits and political contributions made in their personal time.
Under the Hatch Act, federal government employees are banned from engaging in political activities, including making campaign contributions, during work hours.
“Government employees are, on balance, more moderate or more liberal as opposed to the general population,” Schultz said. “Not across the board, but in general.”
Government employees are “more likely to believe in government as opposed to, let’s say, a privatization program,” he added, “programs that we would view as hostile to government.”
Republicans typically campaign on promises to slash government payrolls, which helps explain why recent GOP presidential candidates have received the smaller share of donations from government workers.
Yet while Republicans usually do worse than Democrats, Trump appears to be doing especially poorly in fundraising from government employees.
The 2012 GOP presidential nominee, Mitt Romney, received 14 percent of donations from the same group of agencies surveyed for Trump. Trump received just 5 percent.
Romney got close to $300,000 more from these same departments’ employees than Trump has four years later. Comparisons to previous presidential candidates are of limited value, since they took public funding for their general election campaigns.
Trump might have had a chance to do better than Romney. He discarded much of Republican orthodoxy during his primary campaign, which could have led some federal employees to believe that he’d be more amenable to big government. He vowed, for example, to leave massive social welfare programs virtually untouched.
But Trump also constantly attacked federal institutions. During his primary campaign, he described the federal government as a corrupt, bloated body run by “very, very, stupid people.”
Trump vowed “tremendous cutting” of the government in an interview with The Wall Street Journal in January and singled out the Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency as agencies he’d slash dramatically if not outright eliminate.
Agency employees have likely taken note of Trump’s hostile rhetoric. In the Department of Education’s case, that included Trump’s pledges to hand over control to the states and to fight tooth and nail against Common Core standards.
From Department of Education employees this cycle, Trump received three donations totaling $220. Clinton received 724 donations for more than $74,000. In all, she received 99.7 percent of donations from employees of the department.
Donations from the State Department, which Clinton ran from 2009 to 2013, were even more slanted in her favor. State Department employees gave Trump 39 donations, for $4,652. Over the same time period, they gave their former boss 2,518 donations, for $425,525.
Throughout his campaign, Trump has portrayed himself as a strongman who would toughen up America’s defenses — both militarily and at the border — and who would take care of veterans. It’s probably no coincidence, therefore, that Trump performed best in donations among employees of three agencies: Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs.
But even employees of these more Trump-friendly agencies have overwhelmingly contributed to Clinton’s campaign. From Defense employees, Trump received 341 donations for $43,575. Clinton got 2,392 donations for $225,560, giving her 84 percent of the money. From Homeland Security employees, Clinton got 90 percent of the donations, and from Veterans Affairs she took 88 percent.
Romney performed significantly better than Trump with employees at all three agencies, receiving, for example, $98,153 from Defense employees, which amounted 21 percent of donations.
During the Republican primaries, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said, “Let’s create a little bit of a recession in Washington, D.C., so that we can have economic prosperity outside of Washington.” Fear of such plans might be the truest explanation of these uniformly lopsided donations.
Schultz, the Hamline professor, said “self-preservation”— particularly for workers engaged in public sector unions — probably motivates their political giving.
“This means support for their jobs,” he said. “Clinton, for the most part, is going to be probably a continuation of more or less what Obama is.”
Federal government employees, he said, are likely “more willing to give to somebody who would be more predictable in terms of supporting their livelihood, their jobs, as opposed to somebody who might be less predictable.”
More facts you'd like to pretend don't exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
|
|
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,310 Likes: 112 |
Already posted at least once before how the 97 percent figure is deceptive. It’s a very small percentage that actually donate anything. And in this administration you were probably targeted if you were a democrat. Or if you were assigned on any investigation on the orange fraudster.
Fair play!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
|
|
brutally Kamphausened 15000+ posts
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,634 Likes: 40 |
Already posted at least once before how the 97 percent figure is deceptive. It’s a very small percentage that actually donate anything. And in this administration you were probably targeted if you were a democrat. Or if you were assigned on any investigation on the orange fraudster. And I already posted that far beyond just political donations by FBI/DOJ, there has been massive cover-ups in multiple FBI scandals over the last 20 years a least, that shows a high ratio of FBI/DOJ agents are complicit in covering up abuses in FBI/DOJ. Two FBI agents just today were forced to give testimony about their PROVEN false previous statements about what they knew about he Hunter Biden laptop before he 2020 election, vs. what they said previously under oath. So far as I've been able to see over the last 10 years, there are NO SITUATIONS, NONE, where you acknowledge there has been ANY criminal partisan political abuse of FBI power, by ANY agent, not even Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, or dozens of others in FBI leadership forced to resign or be fired over the last 8 years. And after resigning or being fired for what they did in 2016-2017, then at their new jobs in social media, they coordinated with other Democrat-Bolsheviks who remained in FBI/DOJ and CIA, to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story, AGAIN, during the Nov 2020 election, to rig the election for Joe Biden by suppressing the vote. So... your proving to be an obscenely partisan Democrat-Bolshevik yourself, I don't see how you have exhibited any objectivity when it comes to recognizing FBI corruption, the extent of it, or having the understanding, or even the DESIRE, to weed it out or punish it. Quite the opposite, you seem to cheer on past abuse. And cheer on re-weaponizing the FBI as soon as Trump leaves office, at whatever point Democrats regain power. Likewise, you are absolutely tone-deaf to the FB/DOJ abuses of power in the Mar A Lago raid (even leaders in the FBI now acknowledge there was no justification for a warrant, to have done that raid). And you are likewise one-deaf to the outrageous Constitutional abuses in the four made-up fake trials directed by Merrick Garland and Joe Biden's DOJ, WHILE TRUMP WAS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, no less. BIDEN'S POLITICAL OPPONENT ! Nope, nothing to see here, nothing at all... You cheer on every abuse of power, in setting up a one-party authoritarian Democrat-Bolshevik permanent takeover, and shredding the Constitution and checks and balances in the process to do so. And I JUST CITED, ONE POST ABOVE], sourced and linked, an article that shows a similar 90% to 99% infiltration, the same Democrat-partisan corruption, in at least 17 other federal agencies. Likely all of them. FACT. Cited. Sourced.
|
|
|
|
|