Quote: You couldn't be more wrong about your analysis of Post Crisis continuity.
The characters HAVE aged for one thing, unlike the previous continuity where Superman was 29 for 20 years.
How much have they aged? A couple of years. They won't be allowed to age more than that. You'll never see a Superman comic that says "Ah, I remember 10 years ago..." to refer to something that happened in a previous in-continuity comic, unless it's a "Year One" thing or something. Unless, you get stuff like "Las year, when Superman died..." in a Man of Tomorrow issue from 1997! So everything between Death of Superman and Electric Superman happened in ONE YEAR? The engagement was off for how long, then? Days? How many minutes did Perry White have cancer?
Quote: All your complains are hollowed.
What you consider a hindrance to good storytelling IS good storytelling.
What you consider stagnations is actually growth.
Give examples of good storytelling and "growth" after... say, 1994. The writers were the same as before.
Quote: What you seem to want is stories that don't relate to each other, that are independant of one another and are good or bad on their own.
No, I want them all to be good. If they relate to each other and are good they work for me. YOU, on the other hand, don't care if they're good or not, as long as they relate to each other.
Quote: Since that's the case do yourself a favor and buy the DC archives and reprints.
There's 50 years worth of material there, which is more than enough to keep you happy.
I could say the same to you: Byrne's run is being reprinted. Go buy that and leave today's comics alone.
Quote: Leave the new comics, the ones that are consistant and stand as a whole to new readers, the ones you hate with a passion and want to see shot...
What new Superman comics are consistent and stand as a whole to new readers?!
