It's more pathetic that you consider it pathetic, but I doubt you'll be able to understand that. It's also pathetic (not to mention funny) how worked up you get over stuff like this. If I'd known this was sensitive ground I would have talked about it earlier.
Quote: Stories with Gwen still alive as if she had never died can be done and have been done without altering continuity.
It's not altering it. Continuity doesn't exist. It's, literally, in our minds. It's not like I going back in time and changing history. Ignoring continuity if one considers it necessary has no effect on anything.
The whole point of what I propose is that continuity could be able to co-exist peacefully with lack of continuity. A writer wants to use continuity, he uses it (I bet Geoff Johns or Mark Waid would chose to use it), while others would probably ignore it (Grant Morrison, possibly).
Quote: MAYBE if fanboys like you understood that characters in comics CAN die, never come back and still have a long term effect in the stories then comic books would stop having to relly on reboots that make only the most assnine of comic book readers happy.
It can have a long time effect, I never said it couldn't. The keyword is "can". And, as a matter of fact, characters CAN'T die... because they're not real. Being fictional makes them immortal (PLEASE don't take what I'm saying literally... that would so sad it wouldn't be funny. well, maybe a lil') You're almost 30, man, it's about fucking time you understand comics aren't real.
I would like you to read this line: "...rely on reboots that make only the most assnine of comic book readers happy." Read it out loud. Now tell me what's wrong with it.
Hint: Man of Steel.
Quote: Even more pathetic is that you think that reboots should be used to bring back older elements that were discarted for being too stupid to last and nothing more than gimmicks when reboots are supposed to be used to reinvegorate the stories with NEW concepts, not reborn crap that only people over 50 can appreciate.
For the 30th fucking time, I'm 18!
I don't understand that last paragraph very well. Are you referring to what I said about "a touch of retro"? I won't point out the obvious contradiction (Hint: Man of Steel) since it's become clear that you're unable to understand it. I'd like to address something else: What does this have to do with the current discussion, Moty? Why did you bring it up? Were you hurt by my last post so you tried to bring up something "hurtful" about me (the fact that I don't hate the Silver Age)? If so, please forgive me. It wasn't my intention to hurt your feelings, I was only trying to make you look silly.
