Quote:

How do you feel about the recent Superman news, MOTA?
This means one side gets their version of Superman (the married Jurgens-Byrne Superman), the other side will get their version too (the single SA inspired Superman), and both sides will get a new version (a darker Superman), all at the same time, like I suggested (I swear that was a coincidence, I don't run DC).
This is a step in the right direction and I think that's awesome. Now it depends on the quality of the stories to see if this is a success or not. But, in the meantime, I'm satisfied.
Byrne/Jurgens fans that want to see their version continued should be satisfied too (I'm not one of those, though I love the Byrne/Jurgens version... and because of that I want it to be laid to rest), and Silver Age fans that want to see that version continued in a modern interpretation should be satisfied as well (I think that should be interesting... since it's modern it won't be exactly the same as in the Silver Age).
But, something tells me YOU won't be satisfied...



More BS from the editor that can't make up his mind, Mxy.

If he was going to allow for the inclusion of three Supermen from three different realities then why the fuck do Superman #200, the Godfall arc and include BR as the one and only origin, why not let it be its separate thing from the start?

Like I said, more BS.

Unlike you I don't need three, four or five different Supermen in comics, one is more than enough.

See, before Berganza fuck head, reading Superman comics was a great thing.

I'd get 52 Superman comics a year, all consistant with each other and all telling one continous story.

Now to please the fuck heads like KKK and others the titles have to be broken into THREE different versions or they'll whine that DC has no balls for sticking with Byrne's version.

Comics are like a Rorschach test; everyone has a different opinion on what they are and can be...