There's no such thing as a comic that requieres knowing 17 years worth of continuity, that's a lie that assholes like KK came up with to put continuity down.

When continuity's done right, like in JSA or Busiek's Avengers, everything a reader needs to know about past continuity is told to them in a way that makes sense.

That some readers are too fucking stupid to get it and would rather insult continuity and those that like it because it's easier to them doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the concept of continuity.

I do wonder why it's so fucking hard for you to understand what the era of comics I prefer is one of constant change and evolution, not repetition and stagnation as the era you and KKK want to see come back (which is what's happening in Superman now).

And no, I wouldn't enjoy or support a new Crisis if it's done out of the fucking mess that Berganza created on purpose.

Such a story should have been planned, not made up to fix what a stupid editor with no idea of what he was doing did.

Comics are like a Rorschach test; everyone has a different opinion on what they are and can be...