I said, CLEAR AS DAY, that Siegel and Shuster werent' born with the knowledge of everything about Superman, that it wasn't till they worked on Superboy that they got a better handle on the concept.
Once they got to work on the characters background they got a better understanding of it.
This happens all the time with writer, you stupid fuck.
Byrne and Jurgens were working off what those two had done overall, not just a year or two back in the fucking 40's.
The conclusion, based on the work, was that Clark was the real person over the fake Superman, you idiot.
If you'd bother to read the fucking comics and had a working brain you'd see this, but you're too fucking worried about Stupidgirl and the lack of animals with capes that you can't see it.
Quote: King Krypton said:
Quote: Not my continuity, that's the concept.
I still don't see why it's so hard for people to understand it.
Rocketed from the doom planet Krypton, the last son of Krypton, only one of his kind, etc.
Again, there's nothing in the early Siegel/Shuster material that says nobody else made it out. They never definitively stated it either way. Further, their Krypton was a utopia, which you have railed against for being inherently degrading to the idea of Krypton being an alien world. Worse yet, you have gone out of your way in the past to claim that Siegel and Shuster got their own creation/concept all wrong and that only Byrne/Jurgens has done it right.
So really, you're not arguing for the concept, because you've already debased the creators of that concept and their treatment of their own creation. You're really arguing for the Byrne/Jurgens version of that concept at the expense of all else and verbally lynching anyone who doesn't feel that way. THAT is the issue at hand, not your imagined "everyone wants the Silver Age revived" conspiracy.
Comics are like a Rorschach test; everyone has a different opinion on what they are and can be...
