I still wholeheartedly disagree about the lone Kryptonian aspect.
I think Krypto is Ok..not a fan so much.
Linda/Matrix is a dumb idea
Superboy clone..I still have no opinion of.
kandor is dumb.but certainly quirky.
I have no problm with imaginary tales.
I like a thin businessman luthor more than the mad scientist.
I have no problem leaving the silver age in the silver age.
I hate half assed attempts at bringing back a charcter in a new way..when the old one was fine...ala Kara/linda/matrix/???/?????etc.
I prefer a superman that can't push planets.
I love most silver age comics, as much for the energy and purity of the condensed stories.
I love most bronze age comics.
I like many new comics, but most are written and drawn by people who shouldn't have the job they have IMO. So I don't buy that many anymore.
I'm 31..I'm 3 years older than you ..basically the same age..I just had an older brother.
continuity is a a state of mind. How much has superman aged since 1986? To a new reader Superman's history since 1986 must be just as difficult to understand as any other period. That story is basically 20 years old now. Silver age superman is basically 40 years old. Do you see a correlation there?
I don't have that many points I wanted to make except to say that I don't see a problem with a couple villains and a type of supergirl that resembles kara and is kryptonian.
I'm all for a genre or story growing and if dc's idea of growth is killing or adding or changing I generally don't mind. To change in a way I feel is idiotic or makes no sense..ala linda/matrix/proty/angel.
Dc can make me like a tim drake. they can make me like a non-kara supergirl...they just haven't yet.And since she doesn't exist yet..I don't see a problem. Except the adherrant to the lone kryptonian.
