Quote: I'm Not Mister Mxypltk said: Fuck you. I've never said I don't like what Byrne did (I've said the opposite 100 times!), all I'm saying is that it's about time we get something new.
MOTA: "But new isn't the Silv--"
Yeah, yeah, fuck it, whatever. I don't care if it has SA elements or not. All I'm saying is I wouldn't go nuts if there were.
MOTA: "But Birthrigh--"
Lemme finish, damn it! Fuck Birthright. I haven't read it, I can't judge it until I do (sadly, I can't judge stories on their covers, lenght or wether or not they include a superpet, like some people). MoS came along when we needed something new. Now we need something new again. A lot of people bitched like you're bitching now when MoS came along ("We don't need this..." "Superman is fine like he is..." "Whoever likes MoS is stupid..." "Well, he could use some man-boobs...").
I've never said that Superman is fine like he is right now.
I've said countless times that Superman needs to move away from the bs from the last four years and get back on track.
That has nothing to do with the origin.
Fuck, did you read my post?! You stayed with a line (an example I was giving) and ignored the rest. I know you don't think Superman is right the way he is now: you want him to go back the Jurgens era (the past) instead of moving on to something new (the future). Now you'll say "The Silver Age isn't the future". Well, I don't care. I haven't mentioned BR or the Silver Age in my post until now. I said "something new", which means "NOT Man of Steel". It may (and it probably should) take elements from Man of Steel just like Man of Steel took elements from the Golden and the Silver Age, that are still free for reference. I said you are bitching right now exactly like some fans were bitching in 86, and you just confirmed it.
