Quote: ManofTheAtom said: See, that's a bullshit statement.
If it were at all true then you'd be saying "gee, why do we need to alter ONE version to have more variants?
Wouldn't it be better to revive something like Superman Adventures, which offered a different version from Superman?
Add that to the Smallville comic and the regular comic and you have three different versions of the character, all with three different rules (Adventures had MORE Kryptonitans)".
No, instead you expect ONE version to be split into three different ones.
So don't say that you like different versions when the truth is that you want ONE version to be replaced with three others because you don't like that ONE version. (even though you claim you do...)
It's amazing how much you claim to know me. Who the fuck do you think you are? I, really, honestly, wish that in this three versions thing you get yours. And not just so you shut the fuck up (OI think you'd still bitch if you got exaclty what you're asking for). If this three version thing turns out to be "three versions of one version" (isn't that a contradiction?!) like you think it will, then it will suck. I wish we get one old Byrne inspired Superman, one older SA inspired Superman, and a new Superman. That's what I want and if you think I'm lying for whatever reason then you really are fucking insane.
Quote: I hope it is, there's still no fucking reason to have three different Supermen existing at the same time other than to please the more assnine of fans that can't let go of the 1960's...
Yeah, pleasing the more "assnine" of fans that can't let go of the 80's and new fans as well.
Quote: NOOOO. What works for the CONCEPT.
You mean HOW YOU INTERPRET THE CONCEPT! Someone else can interpret it differently. Once again, YOU'RE NOT GOD!
Quote: It's one thing to be open to change and nostalgia... it's another when SA fuck heads keep insisting that Byrne killed Superman and that the 60's defined the character and anything that's different from that is wrong, as is everyone that likes it.
You mean, exactly what you're doing now with Waid and the 80's.
Quote: You did read what I said, right? Or was that over your head too?
Try again...
No, I read it, I just have a hard time believing it. You just said you'd accept a new version of Superman different from Man of Steel if there was a Crisis to "support it". That contradicts what you said in another thread about Man of Steel being the one true origin "for ever and ever" (your words).
Quote: I'm saying that those comics are clear as water, for those that AREN'T hypocrates and pretend they're something they're not.
BR brings back elements from the Silver Age and Moore's Supreme was a fucking rip off of Superman.
Anyone with eyes can see that... anyone that doesn't is either blind or in denial...
Or (gasp) is an intelligent person who simply happens disagrees with you. Why must people be fucking idiots if they disagree with you?
