quote:Originally posted by I'm Not Mister Mxypltk: It's not something explicit, but there's clearly different views of Lois between the writers, and the Editors are obviously aware of this (it's their job to notice this kinda stuff), but, based on Berganza's quote I posted before, I don't think they care, as long as they give their writers libery. And that rocks.
Dude, the only dissident voice is Austens. Even Didio said he loves Lois, the only one that thinks she's a bitch is Austen and with his attitude this guy's the Larry Hama of the group, he'll be gone less than six months into the relaunch.
quote:Each book can have a different characterization of Lois. What's the point? Are these characterizations less valid because they contradict themselves? What if they are well written but contradict themselves?
Characterization is what makes a character, they're not manequinns, you know?
quote:Silver Age fan? Dude, I'm 18. I think the Silver Age comics are pretty enjoyable, and (like most people) I think the Silver Age version of Superman is the purest one, but I choose the Modern Age above the Silver Age. Mainly because of Moore, Gaiman, Morrison and Allred.
None of those guys has ever written the 'real' modern age Superman, they've written about alternates, copies, or fanboy dreams of the 60's.
