So basically you all think that Supreme is not ripping off Superman, just a homage.
Then explain how Marvel was able to sue Liefeld for doing Fighting American, which is just a homagE of Captain America.
Or the Russian writer who got sued for paying homage to Harry Potter.
Exactly what, for you, makes Fighting American and the Russian female Harry Potter different from Supreme?
All three of them use someone elses plots and the only difference is that they changed how the characters look and what their names are, yet only two people got sued over their homages.
Can you explain it?
It's not a homage when all you do is rewrite what someone else came up with, that's called stealing.
