I have actually...about 10 times so let me paraphrase my thoughts;

1.. It’s a B-A-D idea. [...rassamnfrackin...]

2. I believe its a M-I-S-T-A-K-E to lock and constrict Superman with even more air tight continuity i.e. The Marriage. It strangles the character and makes him predictable... And that's exactly what a child would do.

3. I don't want Superman Comics to become Lois & Clark the ComicS.

4. None of the writers has really figured out how to write Lois Lane, let alone Lois Lane the wife. The fine line that MIGHT make Lois sympathetic does not exist in her current characterization. Lois Lane as it turns out is a very masculine character; her husband is actually the nurturing, feminine side of the family. There positions are flipped. What kind of mother would she be?

5. Lois and Clark are not a team, ala Batman & Robin, and that is one of the keys in the failure to portray the marriage in a sympathetic manner. Lois was created as a Superman Foil, not his confidant & Soulmate®

6 I couldn’t bear the hi-jinks that we would be subject to by the Super-writers being Super-cute.

7 I just don’t see how DC editorial would OR could handle the ‘aging’ issue with a new born baby. I mean the whole Dick Grayson thing is enough.

8. I can’t help but feel that this is a dead end direction that would further alienate the character from his ever shrinking fan base.

9.We don’t need yet another Domestic Adventures of Superman book.

10.We already have 3