|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7
1 post
|
|
1 post
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7 |
I ought to have made some things more clear, even though some of this may repeat what I had said, here or elsewhere.
~ I don't mind spam being removed, either words or pictures. In fact, those who really don't post here except to disrupt are getting to be annoying. (And that picture, yes, was and is wholly ludicrous for a forum like this -- and it continues to be re-posted.)
~ What bothered me was that this was done without anyone saying that this was systematic and intentional, rather than merely scratching irritating itches. If nothing else, my bringing this up got Mike to say that he was doing it, and EDE to say that he endorsed this, which was more than we'd had before.
~ The mods still ought to provide definitions, and the sooner the better, for "spam." Yes, common sense ought to reign, but that still doesn't prevent being arbitrary.
~ I realize this is largely work-it-out-as-you-go. Yet when an issue is brought up, it'd help if it were dealt with fairly soon. No mods have answered my query about whether Legion graphics may be posted, and what happens with a double post. I hope they'll deal with it shortly.
~ I appreciate what the moderators are doing, and thank them for paying such attention. I hold no sour grapes for not having been chosen as one of them. I think they may have underestimated what the role involved, though.
~ I would have preferred the odds against my having been chosen to be yet greater -- because four moderators, in my experience, are too many for a group of this size. (Unless they essentially do little or nothing, and if you now want to monitor spam, that has changed.) Two would work better for consistency in what they are doing.
~ I have nothing as such against TD, even over her desire for privacy. (Though the degree of such desire makes me wonder why those like her are on the Net at all.) I simply don't see her being this reclusive as providing the trust needed to be a proper moderator -- if you're making active changes to traffic. That opinion comes from my having been a mod and supervisor of mods in a half-dozen venues over 20 years. I'm sticking to it, but I won't keep mentioning it.
~ Is every thread that wanders thus "hijacked," as such? That puts a harsh gloss, I'd say, on making asides or asking a question.
~ I'll chill.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-11 9:47 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-11 10:15 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
DuplicateMan
|
2003-06-11 11:50 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Lightning Lad
|
2003-06-11 12:19 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-11 12:33 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
matlock
|
2003-06-11 1:00 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Stuey
|
2003-06-11 1:02 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Kid Prime
|
2003-06-11 1:07 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Lightning Lad
|
2003-06-11 1:27 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-11 3:25 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-11 3:28 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Eryk Davis Ester
|
2003-06-11 3:31 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
matlock
|
2003-06-11 3:51 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
matlock
|
2003-06-11 3:52 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Kid Prime
|
2003-06-12 7:19 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Eryk Davis Ester
|
2003-06-11 9:40 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
A Jar of Cardinals
|
2003-06-11 11:46 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Thriftshop Debutante
|
2003-06-12 12:03 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Eryk Davis Ester
|
2003-06-12 1:00 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MisterJLA
|
2003-06-12 2:36 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-12 1:05 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-12 6:39 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-12 6:41 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-12 6:48 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
matlock
|
2003-06-13 7:28 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-13 7:40 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
matlock
|
2003-06-13 7:43 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-13 7:27 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
URG
|
2003-06-13 6:39 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-14 7:31 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-14 11:45 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Kat
|
2003-06-14 11:56 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Dev Em
|
2003-06-14 12:38 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Johnny Bacardi
|
2003-06-14 2:21 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
CJ
|
2003-06-14 2:32 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
URG
|
2003-06-14 9:08 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-14 9:10 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-14 9:11 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-14 9:13 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-14 11:34 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-15 7:08 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
matlock
|
2003-06-15 8:16 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
sonnie boy
|
2003-06-15 9:02 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
URG
|
2003-06-16 5:22 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-16 5:45 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Dev Em
|
2003-06-16 11:36 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-16 12:06 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Kat
|
2003-06-16 12:22 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-16 1:12 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-16 2:18 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Princess Crujectra
|
2003-06-16 2:49 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Eryk Davis Ester
|
2003-06-16 3:09 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Dev Em
|
2003-06-16 3:13 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-16 3:25 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Poverty Lad
|
2003-06-16 5:05 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-16 5:50 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-16 6:04 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Loser
|
2003-06-16 6:07 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Poverty Lad
|
2003-06-16 6:12 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-16 6:16 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-16 6:20 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Princess Crujectra
|
2003-06-16 6:21 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Senor Widebottom
|
2003-06-16 6:52 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Poverty Lad
|
2003-06-16 6:54 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-17 7:26 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Poverty Lad
|
2003-06-17 7:33 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Dev Em
|
2003-06-16 8:03 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Senor Widebottom
|
2003-06-16 8:06 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Thriftshop Debutante
|
2003-06-16 9:16 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Thriftshop Debutante
|
2003-06-16 9:18 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-16 9:24 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Thriftshop Debutante
|
2003-06-16 9:28 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-16 9:58 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Eryk Davis Ester
|
2003-06-16 10:30 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Eryk Davis Ester
|
2003-06-16 10:47 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Thriftshop Debutante
|
2003-06-16 11:19 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Poverty Lad
|
2003-06-17 12:17 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Poverty Lad
|
2003-06-17 12:21 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Princess Crujectra
|
2003-06-17 1:09 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Poverty Lad
|
2003-06-17 2:19 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-17 2:22 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-17 2:26 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-17 2:40 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Eryk Davis Ester
|
2003-06-17 2:48 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-17 2:50 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Princess Crujectra
|
2003-06-17 3:07 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-17 3:16 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-17 3:19 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-17 3:22 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Eryk Davis Ester
|
2003-06-17 3:22 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-17 3:25 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Princess Crujectra
|
2003-06-17 3:38 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Thriftshop Debutante
|
2003-06-17 3:51 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-17 3:52 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-17 4:00 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-17 4:02 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-17 4:05 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Senor Widebottom
|
2003-06-17 4:13 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Eryk Davis Ester
|
2003-06-17 4:33 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
URG
|
2003-06-17 6:50 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Thriftshop Debutante
|
2003-06-17 7:04 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-17 8:08 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Bevis
|
2003-06-17 8:26 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Loser
|
2003-06-17 8:32 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-17 9:14 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Princess Crujectra
|
2003-06-17 11:33 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Dev Em
|
2003-06-17 11:54 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Bevis
|
2003-06-17 12:34 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-17 1:34 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Dev Em
|
2003-06-17 1:49 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-17 2:12 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-17 2:24 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Bevis
|
2003-06-17 2:46 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Princess Crujectra
|
2003-06-17 2:51 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-17 3:06 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Greybird
|
2003-06-17 3:28 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
matlock
|
2003-06-17 4:58 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Furball
|
2003-06-17 5:28 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-18 7:45 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-18 7:49 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-18 7:49 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
MLLASH
|
2003-06-18 7:51 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Fat Cramer
|
2003-06-18 8:02 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-18 8:08 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Matt Kennedy
|
2003-06-18 8:15 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
THE Franta
|
2003-06-18 8:18 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
|
2003-06-18 6:52 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
thedoctor
|
2003-06-19 7:21 AM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
THE Franta
|
2003-06-18 10:43 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
matlock
|
2003-06-25 3:00 PM
|
Re: Good MORNING, LHQ
|
Dev Em
|
2003-06-25 4:17 PM
|
|
|
|