quote:
Originally posted by TheTimeTrust:
In any case, the Lord of the Rings film was far superior to the Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone film, in my opinion.

Harry Potter joined the JLA in "Rock of Ages"?!

[AAAHHHH!!!] [AAAHHHH!!!] [AAAHHHH!!!] [AAAHHHH!!!] [AAAHHHH!!!]

[wink]

At any rate, I just saw Harry Potter last week (and saw Fellowship twice in theaters) and must say that, as a film, Fellowship was much better. Of course, I haven't read either book, but, as I understand from my good friend at school, the LotR adaptation was almost perfect, save the exclusion of Tom Bombadill, giving Aragon a full sword (as opposed to the broken sword of Isolder), and the inclusion of Arwin for the sake of having a love interest.

Of course, I've not run into anyone who's read Harry Potter and the SORCEROR'S Stone, but if I do, I'll be sure to ask them about the print-to-screen adaptation... [wink]