I actually, perhaps surprisingly, don't disagree with much of that, now you've clarified it.

I note however:

quote:


And part of it is still symbolism, to demonstrate with aid from Muslim nations that the occupation in Iraq is not an American/European/Christian colonization. And assistance from Muslim countries, even only two or three, will make that clear.
The latest I have read on this is that India, Bangladesh, and Turkey will probably not involve themselves in post-war peacekeeping because the war was either considered illegal by their governments, or is intensely unpopular. The speculation is that a UN resolution will not remedy that.

quote:
Yes, France is holding out for a bigger slice of the spoils and power in Iraq.
At least you're honest enough to impliedly admit that the US has the biggest slice.

As for the bogglement, I can't imagine why you'd think that post-war Iraq wouldn't be plagued with guerrilla warfare. You yourself have emphasised the Fedayeen's role. In addition, we're dealing with a country which has been brainwashed through propaganda by Saddam for over two decades. Some of the population will be loyal adherents. I guess we're seeing that in the so-called Sunni triangle.

Further, I read in the Economist that the sacking of Ba'athist public servants by the administrative authority has bolstered the ranks of the disenchanted and unemployed. Probably a poor decision - compare this to Nazi Germany, where many party members were retained by the public service and the police.