Many of these questions could have been asked about Clinton policies, and Clinton wars. I find it highly suspect that there is infinitely more media-orchestrated opposition to Bush's Iraq policies, and barely a word of liberal dissent about Clinton.

I find the double standard of liberals and the liberal media an outrage.

I think I've been clear that I don't support everything Bush does, and I've been very clear that I didn't vote for Bush, but I do feel the media is very hell-bent on destroying his Presidency, and stacks the deck against him at every opportunity.

Many of the questions JQ posted above are asked in a prejudicial way, that ignores the defensive long-term objective of the neo-con pre-emptive invasion policy.
Reagan was condemned as a warmonger as well, right up until the Berlin Wall fell, until the Warsaw Pact nations of Eastern Europe fell to democracy one by one, and even the Soviet Union itself collapsed in 1991.