I'll preface this by saying that I've never been a huge Rush fan.

Both liberals and conservitives are human and make mistakes. Some bigger than others. Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict, plain and simple and antone who fails to see it that way is blinded by thier ideology. The thing is alot of liberals make the case that no one can make any statement regarding right or wrong unless they're perfect. People change thier perspectives, I think that the statements that Rush made concerning drug users (dealers are another story) was wrong and over the top. What is NEVER mentioned is the fact that he made the statement almost 10 years ago and prior to his own addiction. Hopefully now that he has dealt with this first hand he'll favor treatment over encareration. But does this mean that we're to disregard everything the man says? Listening to most liberals lately you'd think that conservitism has been disproven with the failings of one man.

I'm going to say up front that I believe there is right and wrong, but also that I'm not perfect and often do what's wrong.

If you want to deal with what the man says, then fine we have an argument, but don't try point to a mans sin as a negation of his arguments.

It's late so I appologise if this post seems to be rambling.