Quote:

wannabuyamonkey said:
Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:
Why WBAM, I said that Coulter can make all the nasty statements she wants.



No you didn;t, sure I'm sure somewhere along the line you said she had the legal right to say what she wants, but never once have you responded to the argument. Everytime you say that it's wrong and indefencceable that she's attacking their character simply because they are widows. You make the same arguments about Bush and conservitives, but use the suffering of people as a human shield. You're speaking outside of both sides of your mouth and find every excuse not to debate the issue.



I just don't buy the rationallizations you & WB have put forth. It seems to me that Coulter is the one that wants to sidestep debate & just engage in character assasination. What we come down to is there are just lines people don't cross. If Coulter wants to make lots of money taking potshots at 9/11 widows instead of engaging into any type of debate, I think it's fair to judge her for it. If it had been a liberal making the same nasty evil comment Coulter made at a group of conservative 9/11 widows, it would still be evil nasty comments. Basic human decency just isn't defined along partisan lines.

Fair play!