thats my point:

with this kind of logic, you can literally say anything about anything.

my whole post above states it purdy well -- there are limitless 'conspiracy' possibilites, some will have more backing than others. on this whole debacle, jack has found piles of 'evidence' to use. ttt found piles of 'evidence' about no plane flying into the pentagon. bastie has followed claims that the nba playoffs are rigged. msnbc did a report on how seton hall university was lit aflame by student protestors. hundreds claim evidence of ufos and coverups for demi moore forced out of hollywood.

there are evidence trails all over... you can literally state a claim about anything and surely find 'proof' to back it up for various sources (thanks, internet!) -- my previous silly 'convenience' store example was suddenly made somewhat credible by jacks' post.

and, really, thats simply where i just lose all possible credibility in conversations like this. you can have a view point on ANYthing, and it is automatically a possibility. if two or three people think the same way, its a working theory. if four or five agree, and one of them saw something, its an obvious conspiracy -- and it doesnt matter what the subject matter consists of.

and conspiracies will ALWAYS make sense, because its simply a theory, a puzzle to be completed -- even if you mashed the final 4 pieces in, and one of them was actually a lego. its STILL a "complete puzzle" to many people.

...

or is it?