Register
Log In
RKMBs
Forums
.::Robegories::.
Media
the beatles: with or without
Forums
Calendar
Active Threads
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Re: the beatles: with or without
#
24558
2003-12-10
9:53 PM
Joined:
Oct 2001
Posts: 47,855
Likes: 21
Fuckingham Palace!
Nöwheremän
Hip To Be Square
15000+ posts
Nöwheremän
Hip To Be Square
15000+ posts
Joined:
Oct 2001
Posts: 47,855
Likes: 21
Fuckingham Palace!
quote:
since the passing of john, some 25 years ago
Lets do the math here:
John Lennon was shot in 1980
The current year is 2003
Now seeing as its now December & Lennon died in December we are talking full years,I make the equation 23 years!
Some more math for you goes like this:
Rob + math =Rob is a dumb shit!
Copy Link to Clipboard
Entire Thread
Subject
Posted By
Posted
the beatles: with or without
Rob
2003-12-10
2:27 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-10
3:00 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Pig Iran
2003-12-10
3:25 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-10
3:28 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Pig Iran
2003-12-10
3:29 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-10
3:30 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Pig Iran
2003-12-10
3:33 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-10
3:34 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Pig Iran
2003-12-10
3:36 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-10
3:39 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Pig Iran
2003-12-10
3:40 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
First National Bastard
2003-12-10
4:12 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Mr. Nobody
2003-12-10
8:45 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
dsoley
2003-12-10
5:15 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Mr. Nobody
2003-12-10
10:00 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-10
10:22 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-10
10:24 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-10
10:24 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Animalman
2003-12-10
10:37 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-11
1:53 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
First National Bastard
2003-12-11
7:02 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Animalman
2003-12-11
7:05 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
First National Bastard
2003-12-11
7:15 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Animalman
2003-12-11
7:17 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
First National Bastard
2003-12-11
7:23 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Animalman
2003-12-11
7:27 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
First National Bastard
2003-12-11
7:31 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-11
1:26 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-11
3:15 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Rob
2003-12-11
3:17 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
thedoctor
2003-12-11
4:22 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-11
4:43 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
dsoley
2003-12-11
4:45 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-11
5:00 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-11
5:01 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-11
5:03 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-11
5:04 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-11
6:50 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-12
8:04 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-12
12:23 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Kristogar Velo
2003-12-12
12:23 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-12
12:26 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
2003-12-12
2:56 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
2003-12-12
3:01 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-12
3:12 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
2003-12-12
3:39 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-12
4:08 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-12
4:10 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
theory9
2003-12-12
4:32 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
2003-12-12
5:05 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
2003-12-12
5:05 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
theory9
2003-12-12
5:13 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
First National Bastard
2003-12-12
5:21 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Technical Blog
2003-12-12
6:21 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-12
3:26 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Kilgore Trout
2003-12-12
4:34 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-12
4:53 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-12
5:05 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
thedoctor
2003-12-12
5:17 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-12
6:03 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-13
1:33 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-13
2:09 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
2003-12-13
3:50 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-13
3:52 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
2003-12-13
3:55 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-13
3:56 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
2003-12-13
4:07 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Kristogar Velo
2003-12-13
6:55 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-13
3:48 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Maude Lebowski
2003-12-13
3:56 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-13
5:42 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
backwards7
2003-12-14
8:07 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-14
1:36 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-14
2:43 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-14
7:59 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-14
9:55 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-14
11:39 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
First National Bastard
2003-12-15
12:31 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-15
12:53 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-15
2:35 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man
2003-12-15
4:09 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Kristogar Velo
2003-12-15
4:31 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-15
1:43 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Neilencio
2003-12-15
2:21 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-15
2:54 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-15
11:58 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-15
11:59 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-16
12:05 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-16
1:51 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
theory9
2003-12-16
1:58 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-16
2:39 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-16
2:40 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-16
2:42 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
theory9
2003-12-17
8:39 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-16
10:02 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-16
10:12 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-16
10:15 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-16
10:16 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-16
10:26 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-16
10:32 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-16
10:37 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-16
10:48 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-16
11:08 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
theory9
2003-12-17
12:17 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Kilgore Trout
2003-12-17
3:48 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Kristogar Velo
2003-12-17
9:48 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Mr. Nobody
2003-12-17
12:07 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Snapman
2003-12-17
1:08 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-17
3:03 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-17
3:05 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-17
3:33 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
thedoctor
2003-12-17
4:16 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-17
4:34 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-17
6:49 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2003-12-18
8:15 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-18
8:40 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Im Not Mister Mxyzptlk
2003-12-20
1:02 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Irwin Schwab
2003-12-20
1:04 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-21
2:14 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2003-12-28
9:35 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Jim Jackson
2004-01-05
5:36 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
dsoley
2004-01-05
7:28 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Snapman
2004-01-05
8:43 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Kristogar Velo
2004-01-06
6:37 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Kristogar Velo
2004-01-06
6:37 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2004-01-06
10:37 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Pete Townshend
2004-01-20
5:28 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
First National Bastard
2004-01-21
8:48 AM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Nöwheremän
2004-01-21
3:45 PM
Re: the beatles: with or without
Snapman
2004-01-21
4:07 PM
Hop To
.::Robegories::. ------
Comic Books
Media
Sports and Wrestling
Women
Games and Tech
.::Important::. ------
off topic and offensive posts
Fortress of Awesome Chat
Politics and Current Events
Deep Topics
Writer's Block
RDCW
Print Thread
Switch to Flat Mode
Show Likes
Link Copied to Clipboard
View Profile
Private Message
Website
Follow User
Forum Posts
Like Summary
Default Style
UBBT77 - Dark
UBBT80
Forum Rules
·
Mark All Read
Contact Us
·
Forum Help
·
RKMBs
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0