Quote: ManofTheAtom said: I have no problem with buying three, four or even six Superman titles a month.
And, yet, you bitched about how horrible the stories were while you were buying all of these titles. Unlike you, most people don't buy what they don't like.
Quote: ManofTheAtom said: I see no reason to change each one to be a different continuity...
The funny thing here is that if there was only one Superman title set in Post Crisis continuity right now the rant would be "why can't DC just make another title that takes place in the SA??"
Silver Age fans have been wanting their Superman since Crisis was launched. This isn't a recent event. It's just that now, with the internet, they can be more vocal about it.
Quote: ManofTheAtom said: Even so, there's no reason to make a change.
Why change what's already out there when you can add to it and make everyone happy?
So you think Crisis should have never happened? Why did DC change something when they could have just added to it?
Quote: ManofTheAtom said: Marvel didn't alter an existing Spider-Man comic to tell stories in a new continuity...
Spider-Man is the same character he was when introduced. He hasn't gone through a revamp like Superman. Ultimates was a marketing ploy to bring in new readers WITHOUT having them wade through years worth of continuity to be able to understand the stories or character.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
