Quote: ManofTheAtom said: I got your question, you don't get my answer so I'm gonna simplify it for you:
No, I think he understood your answer just fine.
Quote: ManofTheAtom said: I rather have a real editor that can give me five ongoing series set in one continuity then an ass like Eddie Berganza who would need to split the character into three pieces to please a vocal group of whinners.
By whiners, do you mean fans who pay money to read the books he's editing?
Quote: ManofTheAtom said: See, the problem is not with the character, the problem is with the whinner who are unable to understand that far as comics go their character is long gone, changed by something better (even if they don't want to accept it).
So, you're not a whiner for bitching about BR changing Superman? And something better?
MOTA, you ignorant slut, this is just your opinion. You can't say definitevly that the modern Supes is better than SA. That's your tight assed opinion.
Quote: ManofTheAtom said: The kind of Superman that KKK, you and others want is a two dimensional caricature whose time is long over, a fact that becomes more and more apparent every time someone like KKK opens his mouth...
Or maybe they prefer a more escapist story that the SA offered. That was the whole purpose of the SA, escapism. Escape from racism, war, famine, shitty economy, etc. There is nothing wrong in wanting that. There is something wrong in being a total ass who can't understand it, so you belittle it.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
